News:

Blessed are they who hunger and thirst for justice: for they shall be filled. The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple. Bless thou the Lord, O my soul. Let the words of my mouth, and the meditation of my heart, be acceptable in thy sight, O Lord, my strength, and my redeemer.

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
51
Geopolitics / Gaza / Lebanon War Day 377 / 31: Remembering ✨ Yahya Sinwar
« Last post by AGelbert on October 18, 2024, 06:14:51 pm »

Gaza / Lebanon War Day 377 / 31: Remembering Yahya Sinwar ✨


The Anti-Empire Project 21.8K subscribers Oct 18, 2024  Gaza War Sit Reps

With Jon Elmer. We talk about Yahya Sinwar, his analysis and strategy, and his defiance to the end. And then to Yemen and Lebanon and the speeches of Naim Qassem and Seyed Abdelmalik Badr el Din al-Houthi.

@soberthinking2102
Yahya Sinwar was a great man.
A great man is hard on himself. A small man is hard on others. – Confucious, Spring and Autumn Period

Yahya Sinwar's life story is an example of True Gold.
True Gold fears not the test of fire. – Traditional Chinese Proverb

Patience is a tree with bitter roots that bears sweet fruits. – Traditional Chinese Proverb
Do not worry if others do not understand you. Worry if you do not understand them. – Confucius, Spring and Autumn Period

This is why Hamas AND Hiszbollah AND Ansarallah AND Iran will ALL be 🗽 victorious over the morally bankrupt Genocidal IDF:
He is victorious who knows when and when not to fight. – Sun Zi, Spring and Autumn Period

---------------------

The German Ludwigshafen am Rhein warship reportedly destroyed Hezbollah’s drone near Naqourah;
Israeli warplanes attacked Khiam;
Israeli warplanes attacked Houla;
Israeli artillery shelled Khiam;
Hezbollah artillery shelled areas near Udaysah;
Hezbollah artillery shelled Misgav Am;
Hezbollah artillery shelled Shebaa Farms;
On October 17, Hezbollah destroyed four Merkava tanks near Labounah;
The Israeli army rigged Mhaibib and destroyed the entire village // are you sure rigged is a right definition;
Sirens sounded in Haifa;
Sirens sounded in Maalit Tarshiha;
Israeli warplanes attacked Aita al-Shaab;
Hezbollah attacked Kiryat Shemona with rockets;
Clashes were continued in Qozah;
Clashes continued near Marun al-Ras;
Clashes continued near Yaroun.
https://southfront.press/category/all-articles/products/maps/

October 18, 2024 🕊️ Daniel Davis 🕯️🦅 Deep Dive

Sinwar is Dead But Will 🗽 Hamas Die with Him w/Raj Menon 👍
52
👉 Emojies by AGelbert. 👈

October 18, 2024

AGelbert NOTE: Reality based comments on the reality based article posted here after the comments:

Charles_Beauchamp 11 hours ago edited
If the current trend of an upswing in denied prior authorizations coupled with rural - metropolitan disparities in application of rules, regulations & reimbursements continues, there will be an implosion of rural primary care independent of the hospital.

BeckyR 12 hours ago
And yet most Republicans say they want all seniors to transition to this type of care that only ensures profits for the insurance companies while putting people's health and safety at risk!!

Lou_L  > BeckyR 2 hours ago
Over the years of making Hill visits to advocate for Long Term Care Hospitals, I’ve seen a remarkable change in the tone from the Republican offices. It used to be they didn’t want to hear any criticism of Medicare Advantage. During the past two years they’ve become increasingly aware of MA plans abusing prior auth to deny care. This report will really help hammer home the message.

Steven_B_MD 15 hours ago
Is anyone surprised that Medicare Advantage plans appear to be more interested in profits than patients?

Brant_S_Mittler_MD_JD a day ago
Thanks for Joyce Frieden's usual excellent reporting. But the last paragraph from the managed care lobby should be read with full understanding that Medicare HMO data is largely proprietary. The HMOs use it to their advantage when they want to. They use researchers who they know will produce results they want. if you look at their data sharing arrangements you will see that you can't get the data or have to pay $millions to get it if they would even sell it to you. These data reflect care produced with taxpayer dollars yet taxpayer institutions can't use them for objective outside reviews. Virtually all the quality data on Medicare comes from Fee for Service (FFS) Medicare. Those data are produced by non-HMO medical practices i.e. individual doctors, NPs, PAs, nurses laboring late into the day and night producing the data that Medicare beneficiaries get to use to look at quality, diagnosis + prognosis, test ordering and outcomes. The HMO part of Medicare is largely opaque and contributes NOTHING to transparency and quality analyses while making outrageous profits for its overpaid executives and armies of prior authorization clerks. It's a national disgrace that is impossible to change due to the power of the HMO lobby in DC and state legislatures. "Plea for service" runs U.S. health care.


October 17, 2024 by Joyce Frieden, Washington Editor, MedPage Today

Use of 🔨😈 Prior Authorization Up in 😈🎩 Medicare Advantage Plans, Senate Report FindsPost-acute care services 🔨😈 targeted for coverage denials

Medicare Advantage plans have increased their use of prior authorization and appear to be targeting certain types of care -- such as expensive post-acute hospital care -- for coverage denials, according to a report issued Thursday by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.

💵🎩 Insurers "are using prior authorization to protect billions in profits while forcing vulnerable patients into impossible choices," the subcommittee's report concluded.

"This is particularly troubling when recent analyses indicate that Medicare Advantage is more expensive than traditional Medicare," the report continued. "There is a role for the free market to improve the delivery of healthcare to America's seniors, but there is nothing inevitable about the harms done by the current arrangement. Insurers can and must do better, for the sake of the American healthcare system and the patients the government entrusts to them."

Four Years of Data

The subcommittee sought data about prior authorization requests and denials between 2019 and 2022 from three of the largest Medicare Advantage insurers: UnitedHealthcare, Humana, and CVS. "This date range aligned with increases in concern from patients and providers that prior authorization was threatening seniors' well-being and the viability of medical practices," the report authors noted. "The time period also overlapped with reporting showing that Medicare Advantage insurers were expanding their use of AI [artificial intelligence] and other methods of  automating the  processing of healthcare claims."

In addition, lawmakers "also collected documents used in training workers evaluating prior authorization requests, and explanations of the procedures used to evaluate or measure these workers and determine their prospects for advancement. The subcommittee has also obtained documents related to the use of algorithms, AI, and other predictive technologies, including the way the companies use these technologies in the context of prior authorization and other utilization management practices."

The report noted that "Medicare Advantage insurers are intentionally using prior authorization to 😈 boost 💰 profits by targeting costly yet critical stays in post-acute care facilities. Insurer    denials at these facilities, which help people recover from injuries and illnesses, can force 🥵 seniors to make difficult choices about their health and finances in the vulnerable days after exiting a hospital."

In particular, the report found:

In 2022, both UnitedHealthcare and CVS denied prior authorization requests for post-acute care at rates that were approximately three times higher than the companies' overall denial rates for prior authorization requests. In that same year, Humana's prior authorization denial rate for post-acute care was over 16 times higher than its overall rate of denial.

CVS's prior authorization denial rate for post-acute care remained relatively stable during the period reviewed. However, the number of post-acute care service requests CVS subjected to prior authorization increased by 57.5%, far higher than the company's roughly 40% growth in enrollment during that period.

In a May 2019 presentation, CVS determined that it had saved more than $660 million the previous year by denying prior authorization requests its Medicare Advantage beneficiaries submitted for inpatient facilities. A majority of these savings came from "denied admissions."

While the use of prior authorization has expanded significantly for all types of insurance since the 1980s, its use in Medicare Advantage plans has particularly increased in the last 5 years. The American Journal of Managed Care found that the share of Medicare Advantage enrollees in a plan requiring prior authorization for at least one category of healthcare services was 72.6% in 2019, which was similar to the rate it had been in 2009. But by 2023, KFF reported that 99% of Medicare Advantage enrollees were in a plan requiring prior authorization for some services.

"Although post-acute care facilities represent a significant share of all prior authorization denials, they represent only a portion of all prior authorization requests, meaning that an insurer's denial rate for post-acute care could increase significantly from one year to the next even as the insurer's overall denial rate, which is publicly available, appears relatively unchanged," the report found. "At the facility level, these changes can be striking. For example, between 2019 and 2022, UnitedHealthcare's denial rate for skilled nursing facilities increased by a factor of nine."

Use of 🤖 AI Examined

In its investigation of the plans' use of artificial intelligence to consider prior authorization requests, the subcommittee found that:

Facing pressure to cut costs in the Medicare Advantage division, in April 2021 CVS deployed "Post-Acute Analytics," which used AI to reduce the amount of money spent on skilled nursing facilities. CVS initially expected that it would save approximately $4 million per year, but within 7 months, the company projected that an expanded version of the initiative would save the company more than $77 million over the next 3 years.

In April 2021, an internal UnitedHealthcare committee voted to approve the use of 🤖 "Machine 😉 Assisted Prior Authorization" in the company's utilization management efforts. They were told that the doctor or nurse reviewing the case still had to "verif[y] that the primary evidence is acceptable," but also that testing of the technology had reduced the average time needed to review a request by 6 to 10 minutes.

In early 2021, UnitedHealthcare tested a "HCE [Healthcare Economics] Auto Authorization Model." Minutes from a meeting of an internal committee reviewing the model noted that initial testing had produced "faster handle times" for cases as well as "an increase in adverse determination rate," which the meeting minutes attributed to "finding contraindicated evidence missed in the original review." The committee voted to tentatively approve the model at a meeting the following month.
Recommendations for CMS

The subcommittee recommended several actions for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to take to address some of the issues raised in the report, including requiring that prior authorization information be broken down by category, conducting targeted audits under certain circumstances, and implementing regulations to ensure that predictive technologies do not have "undue influence" on human reviewers.

In particular, regarding the plans' use of AI to evaluate prior authorization requests, "CMS has not provided sufficiently specific guidance on separating the use of predictive technologies from patient determinations regarding post-acute care," the authors concluded, adding that in a February 2024 memo, the agency said AI could be used to "assist" in predicting a patient's length of stay, but that medical necessity determinations had to be based on "the individual patient's circumstances." However, the agency provided no further guidance on ensuring that the AI prediction didn't have undue influence on the length-of-stay authorization, they said.

Asked to comment on the report, a spokesperson for America's Health Insurance Plans -- a trade group for health insurers -- said in an email that "More than 33 million seniors and people with disabilities choose Medicare Advantage for their health coverage because it provides them better care at a lower cost than fee-for-service. Studies show that MA [Medicare Advantage] outperforms fee-for-service in nine out of 10 quality measures focused on prevention and chronic care, and 95% of MA beneficiaries say they are satisfied with their coverage and care."

A spokesperson for Humana told MedPage Today in an email that "This is a partisan report laden with errors and misleading claims. In fact, Senator [Richard] Blumenthal's team declined to correct those errors and mischaracterizations that Humana identified after reviewing certain heavily redacted excerpts prior to the report's release."
https://www.medpagetoday.com/publichealthpolicy/medicare/112434
53

Richard D. Wolff ✨ & Michael Hudson ✨ | How the U.S. Took Over the World: The End of International Law!

Dialogue Works 203K subscribers October 17, 2024

Michael Hudson is President of The Institute for the Study of Long-Term Economic Trends (ISLET), a Wall Street Financial Analyst, Distinguished Research Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri, Kansas City. He is the author of Super-Imperialism: The Economic Strategy of American Empire (Editions 1968, 2003, 2021), ‘and forgive them their debts’ (2018), J is for Junk Economics (2017), Killing the Host (2015), The Bubble and Beyond (2012), Trade, Development and Foreign Debt (1992 & 2009) and of The Myth of Aid (1971), amongst many others.

ISLET engages in research regarding domestic and international finance, national income and balance-sheet accounting with regard to real estate. We also engage in the economic history of the ancient Near East.

Michael acts as an economic advisor to governments worldwide including China, Iceland and Latvia on finance and tax law. He gives presentations on various topics at conferences and meetings and can be booked here. Listen to some of his many radio interviews to hear his hyperspeed analysis of the geo-political machinations of global economics. Travel costs and a per diem are appreciated.
https://michael-hudson.com/

Richard D. Wolff is Professor of Economics Emeritus, University of Massachusetts, Amherst where he taught economics from 1973 to 2008. He is currently a Visiting Professor in the Graduate Program in International Affairs of the New School University, New York City.

Earlier he taught economics at Yale University (1967-1969) and at the City College of the City University of New York (1969-1973). In 1994, he was a Visiting Professor of Economics at the University of Paris (France), I (Sorbonne). Wolff was also a regular lecturer at the Brecht Forum in New York City. (https://www.rdwolff.com/about)

🕯️ David Harvey ✨: A Brief History of Neo-Liberalism & The Financialization of Power | ACC 01-03


Alexander Koryagin 3.8K subscribers  Nov 20, 2023  #selfcare #marx #aristotle
A Brief History of Neo-Liberalism & The Financialization of Power

Link to mp3s of the podcast: https://t.me/alexanderkoryagin/234
https://t.me/inforointerno/1545

Prof. David Harvey's pilot episode. A quick history of the rise and growth of Neo-Liberalism. The crash of 2008 challenges Neo-Liberalism. Financial services become part of GDP in the 1970s and legitimize the power of financial institutions.

November 2018 (Season 1 - Episode 01-03)

===

David Harvey's Anti-Capitalist Chronicles is a bi-weekly podcast and video series that looks at capitalism through a Marxist lens.

David Harvey's Anti-Capitalist Chronicles is a Democracy at Work (d@w) production. D@W produces media and live events to expose capitalism’s systemic problems and to show how democratizing our workplaces solves them. We can do better than capitalism!

HOST: David Harvey is the foremost Marxist thinker about political economy and has been teaching Karl Marx's Capital for over 40 years. He currently teaches at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. Prof. Harvey has written extensively on the significance of Marx's Capital for understanding contemporary capitalism, and will be presenting this knowledge and more to his podcast audience.

==

1. A Brief History of Neo-Liberalism, Episode 01
2. Contradictions of Neo-Liberalism, Episode 02
3. The Financialization of Power, Episode 03

#marx #marxism #financialization #neoliberalism #financialisation #anticapitalism #acc #anticapitalistchronicles#davidharvey #daw #democracyatwork

===Links to David Harvey's work:
https://www.democracyatwork.info/davi...
https://www.democracyatwork.info/acc_...

Link to the full playlist, David Harvey's Anti-Capitalist Chronicles:
a) Democracy at Work:    • David Harvey's Anti-Capitalist Chroni... 
b) Politics in Motion:    • Anti-Capitalist Chronicles with David... 

(neither link includes the first three episodes I posted, though)

===Episode Description:

1. S01 E01 ANTI-CAPITALIST CHRONICLES: A BRIEF HISTORY OF NEO-LIBERALISM
Prof. David Harvey's pilot episode. In this part 1 of 3, he provides a quick history of the rise and growth of Neo-Liberalism. https://www.democracyatwork.info/acc_...

2. S01 E02 ACC Contradictions of Neo-Liberalism (Nov 2018)
The crash of 2008 challenges Neo-Liberalism. https://www.democracyatwork.info/acc_...

3. S01 E03 ACC The Financialization of Power (Nov 2018)
Financial services become part of GDP in the 1970s and legitimize the power of financial institutions. https://www.democracyatwork.info/acc_...

===

[harvey acc 2018 01 03] (Edited and uploaded by Alexander Koryagin, 2023)

I just noticed that the first three episodes of David Harvey's "Anti-Capitalist Chronicles" are inexplicably not on YouTube.

It's actually one larger podcast on the history of Neoliberalism, divided into three parts. Therefore, I merged them into one and uploaded to YouTube for the sake of convenience.

In my estimation, a truly outstanding piece of work by Prof. Harvey, absolutely essential for understanding the basic structure of our contemporary global political and economic situation, not just the US and Europe, but the World as a whole.

Enjoy! 🌸🕉

===
Introduction to Political Philosophy Course by Alexander Koryagin:    • Intro to Social and Political Philoso... 
My Philosophy & Methodology of the Natural & the Social Sciences playlist:
   • EXTENDED Philosophy of Science 

===
My Telegram: https://t.me/alexanderkoryagin
My Discord:   / discord 

#philosophy #naturalism #selfcare #socrates #plato #buddha #aristotle #politicalphilosophy #philosophyofscience #pedagogy #education #philosophyofeducation #politicalphilosophy #philosophyofscience #historyofphilosophy  #socialtheory
54
Geopolitics / 🚨 ‘Catastrophic Development’ 👀
« Last post by AGelbert on October 17, 2024, 04:13:36 pm »
👉 Graphics and emojies by AGelbert. 👈



October 17, 2024 By 🕯️🗽 Palestine Chronicle Staff


Catastrophic Development’ – Russia Warns Israel against Attack on Iran’s Nuclear Sites


🕯️🗽 COL. Lawrence Wilkerson: Can Israel Humble Iran?


Judge Napolitano - 🕯️ Judging 🗽 Freedom 465K subscribers October 17, 2024

COL. Lawrence Wilkerson:  Can Israel Humble Iran?
55
🕯️🗽 Larry Johnson: Current Events In Israel, Ukraine & The US Election



🗽 Kontrarian Korner 747 subscribers Oct 15, 2024
Kontrarian Korner #22

I had Larry Johnson on the podcast yesterday to give us an update on what is going on around the world. We talked Israel/Iran, Ukraine, and also the US election. If you're interested in current events you will enjoy this wide ranging conversation.

AGelbert (i.e. @soberthinking2102) COMMENTS:
👉 Excellent reality based discussion!
Chinese Proverbs to ponder:
A state that is great carries the seeds of its demise, just as a giant tree singles itself out for the blow of the axe. Weakness brings life, strength brings death. – Lao Zi, Spring and Autumn Period
There is no victory in winning a hundred battles. There is victory in subduing your enemy without fighting at all. – Sun Zi, Spring and Autumn Period
Patience is a tree with bitter roots that bears sweet fruits.
A tiger does not take insults from sheep.
The art of war lies in thwarting the enemy’s plans, in breaking up his alliances, and then, only then, in attacking his army. – Sun Zi, Spring and Autumn Period

Do not worry if others do not understand you. Worry if you do not understand them. – Confucius, Spring and Autumn Period
A great man is hard on himself. A small man is hard on others. – Confucious, Spring and Autumn Period
He is victorious who knows when and when not to fight. – Sun Zi, Spring and Autumn Period

👉 The HIT PARADE of ABOMINABLE BEHAVIORS:
HERE is the LIST, straight from ☝🏻Proverbs, of what DEFINES NETANYAHU's morally bankrupt  BEHAVIOR, and that of ALL U.S. Presidents at least since JFK was cruelly assassinated:
"These six things doth the Lord hate: yea, seven are an abomination unto him:
A proud look,
a lying tongue,
and hands that shed innocent blood,
An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations,
feet that be swift in running to mischief,
A false witness that speaketh lies,
and he that soweth discord among brethren." -- Proverbs 6:16-19

👉 "So teach us to number our days, that we may apply our hearts unto wisdom." -- Psalm 90:12
56


GARLAND NIXON SPEECH - UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL 10/3/2023




57
Geopolitics / The Empire's Terror Soap Box
« Last post by AGelbert on October 16, 2024, 11:26:06 pm »
👉 Graphics and emojies by AGelbert. 👈



Robert Fisk ✨ and the Great War for Civilization (w/ 🕯️🕊 Lara Marlowe)

“Terrorism is a word that has become a plague on our vocabulary, the excuse and reason and moral permit for state-sponsored violence – our violence – which is now used on the innocent of the Middle East ever more outrageously and promiscuously,” he writes. “Terrorism, terrorism, terrorism. It has become a full stop, a punctuation mark, a phrase, a speech, a sermon, the be-all and end-all of everything that we must hate in order to ignore justice and occupation and murder on a mass scale. Terror, terror, terror, terror. It is a sonata, a symphony, an orchestra turned to every television and radio station and news agency, the soap-opera of the Devil, served up on prime-time or distilled in wearingly dull and mendacious form by right-wing “commentators of the American east coast or the Jerusalem Post or the intellectuals of Europe. Strike against Terror. Victory over Terror, War on Terror. Everlasting War on Terror. Rarely in history have soldiers and journalists and presidents and kings aligned themselves in such thoughtless, unquestioning ranks.

🕯️🕊️ The Chris Hedges YouTube Channel 49K subscribers Oct 16, 2024

Support my independent journalism at Substack: https://chrishedges.substack.com/

Follow me on social media: https://linktr.ee/chrishedges

Joining host Chris Hedges is Lara Marlowe, journalist and author, to talk about how her former husband and colleague Robert Fisk encapsulated all of that in his years as a journalist and writer and how his work, specifically his book "The Great War for Civilization,” serves as one of the West’s great tools in understanding the modern Middle East.


Transcript
Chris Hedges 

There are few reporters I admire more than Robert Fisk, who died in 2020, and who spent over four decades covering the Middle East. His book The Great War for Civilization is a masterpiece. It remains a vital book for understanding the modern Middle East. An Arabic speaker, his reporting spanned the war against the Soviets in Afghanistan – he was one of very few western reporters to interview Osama bin Laden – the civil war and Israeli occupation in 1982 of Lebanon, the Iran-Iraq war, the Islamic revolution in Iran, Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait and the U.S. invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan. He was unsparing in his reporting on the apartheid state of Israel covering the first and second intifadas or uprisings by the Palestinians. He documented the brutal repression of the Islamic movement and civil war in Algeria, spent considerable time in Iran and Lebanon where he was based. Most important, he saw war up close and did not flinch from describing its senseless brutality, the bungling of Western governments, the despotic Arab regimes that have sold out their own people and the Palestinians, the lies told to mask war crimes and the suffering of those, including children, caught in the terrible maw of war. The power of the book is not simply his lyrical writing and dogged reporting, but his erudition -- he had a PhD in political science from Trinity College Dublin. He was acutely aware that without historical context nothing that takes place in the Middle East can be understood. He distrusted all authority, a distrust no doubt spawned by being packed off as a young boy, as I was, to a boarding school, an experience we both loathed. He excoriated the sententious mandarins in the press who eat out of the hands of government and military sources and function as stenographers for power. He knew who he was writing for, those the world forgets, those whose voices are silenced, those who suffer, those who are reviled. And he had an unflagging commitment to the truth, even when it reflected badly on those, such as the Palestinians, he cared about.   

“Terrorism is a word that has become a plague on our vocabulary, the excuse and reason and moral permit for state-sponsored violence – our violence – which is now used on the innocent of the Middle East ever more outrageously and promiscuously,” he writes. “Terrorism, terrorism, terrorism. It has become a full stop, a punctuation mark, a phrase, a speech, a sermon, the be-all and end-all of everything that we must hate in order to ignore justice and occupation and murder on a mass scale. Terror, terror, terror, terror. It is a sonata, a symphony, an orchestra turned to every television and radio station and news agency, the soap-opera of the Devil, served up on prime-time or distilled in wearingly dull and mendacious form by right-wing “commentators of the American east coast or the Jerusalem Post or the intellectuals of Europe. Strike against Terror. Victory over Terror, War on Terror. Everlasting War on Terror. Rarely in history have soldiers and journalists and presidents and kings aligned themselves in such thoughtless, unquestioning ranks. In August 1914, the soldiers thought they would be home by Christmas. Today, we are fighting for ever. The war is eternal. The enemy is eternal, his face changing on our screens. Once he lived in Cairo and sported a moustache and nationalized the Suez Canal. Then he lived in Tripoli and wore a ridiculous military uniform and helped the IRA and bombed American bars in Berlin. Then he wore a Muslim Iman’s gown and ate yogurt in Teheran and planned Islamic revolution. Then he wore a white gown and lived in a cave in Afghanistan and then he wore another silly moustache and resided in a series of palaces around Baghdad. Terror, terror, terror.

Finally, he wore a kufiyyeh headdress and outdated Soviet-style military fatigues. His name was Yasser Arafat, and he was the master of world terror, and then a super-statesman, and then again, a master of terror, likened by his Israeli enemies to the terror-Meister of them all, the one who lived in the Afghan cave. Koining me to discuss Robert Fisk's "The Great War for Civilization," as well as her own memoir, "Love in a Time of War: My Years with Robert Fisk," is the journalist Laura Marlowe, who was married to Robert and worked with him from 1987 to 2003. I think your book is a great companion to Robert's book, because while it's the story of your relationship, I mean, you certainly capture Robert, who I knew very well, but it also deals a lot with the mechanics of how you get stories, which Robert doesn't do so much of in the book. And I'd like to begin with, as both of you do in your books, with the shooting down of the Iranian Airbus by the [USS] Vincennes, the American warship it. I believe in your book, you talk about it having a profound impact on you, and one of the things I want you to do is not only describe what happened, and this just typifies almost every story you and Robert covered the lies that are told to cover up the reality.

Lara Marlowe 

I think we were on holiday in Ireland when we heard that the Americans had shot down a civilian airliner flying over the Persian Gulf, and we basically raced to the airport, got on the first flight to Dubai, and there were packs of journalists there, all trying to get to Iran to cover the tragedy, well actually Robert would dislike me calling it a tragedy. It was a war crime, really. The Iranian embassy wouldn't give any visas, wouldn't let anyone travel. And this went on for maybe two or three days, and we spent a whole night trying to get a boat across the Persian Gulf. And Robert at one point, saw all of his colleagues, all of his competition, sail away towards Iran without him, because they wouldn't let me on the boat, because I had a US passport, and there was a separate, different regulation for Brits. And he said, do you know how much I love you? You know, I just saw my competition sail away without me. And he told me it was one of the hardest decisions he'd ever made in journalism. So we went back to our hotel, I think it was the International hotel in Dubai, very near the airport. And we were pretty exhausted. We'd been up all night, bedraggled, and somebody ran into the lobby of the hotel saying, the Iranians are sending a plane, the Iranians are sending a plane! So we raced to the airport, got on a civilian airliner, not unlike the one which the Americans had just shot down a few days before, flew to Bandar Abbas. The Iranians, took all the journalists who were on the plane, dozens and dozens of us, to a cold storage warehouse where the bodies of the, if my memory is correct, I think it was 263 people had been killed. And there were piles of well... they were lined up, the women in one row, the men in another area, and then the people who they weren't able to put back together or didn't have recognizable parts of, there were just parts, arms, legs, body organs piled up. It was pretty horrific, and it was starting to smell because several days had passed, and I remember two bodies in particular. One of the Revolutionary Guards said to me, you're a woman, so you're allowed to look at her, because they wouldn't let men look at an Iranian woman, even dead. And they opened, they were all sort of wrapped up in like plastic sheeting, and they unwrapped the plastic around her, there was a really beautiful woman with chestnut colored hair, and she looked quite peaceful. I'd say she was in her late 30s, maybe early 40s. I can still remember her face, and it's been... that was 1988, how many years is that? 46 years? Something like that. And then the other one I remember really well was a three year old girl called Leila Behbahani. I even remember her name, who had been on her way to a wedding, and she was wearing a pale blue dress and little black patent leather shoes and tiny earrings, and her face was all screwed up. She was crying, so she obviously realized something was wrong when she died. And so after showing us this carnage, the Iranians took us to the former Intercontinental Hotel in Bandar Abbas, and they prepared this big feast of, I think it was roast lamb. And I don't need to tell you how sick I felt to the stomach, having just been looking at all these dead bodies and smelling dead bodies which smell a bit like lamb. And so Robert and I were pretty horrified at this big feast they'd put on for us. And most of the journalists went in and sat down and ate lunch. And Robert, and this is one example of his incredible inventiveness as a journalist, started chatting to the receptionist in the hotel, and he said, you must have a telex machine. And they said, Yes. And he said, Oh, could I just say hello to the Telex operator? And we went behind the reception desk, and Robert started sweet talking the Telex operator, who spoke English, and he asked permission, sat down at the Telex machine and started writing his front page story directly onto the Telex machine, which amazed me, it really did. And then, sure enough, the hotel pulled the plug on the Telex after a few minutes, but he must have got 200-300 words out anyway. And then they took us back to the airport to fly back to Dubai, and Robert found a coin telephone machine. I remember when we had pay telephones, and he managed to get Iranian coins from someone. And the figures, of course, are the same in Farsi as in Arabic. They're Arabic numerals. So he he wrote down the phone number, which was on the machine called the switchboard of, he was still with the Times then in London, and said, Call me back on this number. They called him back, and he started dictating the rest of his story to London. The Iranians had given none of us access to any kind of communication whatsoever, and Robert's colleagues were furious that he had a front page story when they did not. We then flew back to Dubai in the middle of the night. I was shattered, because we'd had two nights without sleep, and most of the journalists were just kind of, you know, lying back in their seats trying to recover their senses. Robert crept into the cockpit and interviewed the pilot of the first Iranian aircraft to make the exact same journey from Bandar Abbas to Dubai, since the Americans, since the USS Vincennes, had shot down the Airbus. And so we got another second brilliant story out of it. The next day, the Times of London had been bought by Rupert Murdoch, who, as you know, is very conservative, also owns the Wall Street Journal, Fox News, I don't need to say more by way of explanation. Robert's foreign editor said, apparently it was a suicide airliner. And Robert said, that's utter bullshit. It was a civilian airliner. I've seen the dead civilians who died on it. And the pilot he just interviewed, knew the pilot of the Iranian Airbus. And he said, you know he was he had also found some expert in Dubai who told him that the, well the pilot had also told him, that the military transponder on the USS Vincennes could not communicate with a civilian airliner. They were on different frequencies. They could not hear each other because the Americans kept saying, We warned them. We warned them. We warned them, and they didn't respond to our warnings, therefore, they shot them down.

Chris Hedges 

And they also said the plane was descending towards the ship.

Lara Marlowe 

Yeah, they made it up. They completely made it up. And so Robert was, I witnessed this argument in our hotel room in Dubai. He was yelling at his foreign editor and saying, this is utter bullshit, I forbid you to publish this. And this eventually led to his resignation from the London Times and to his employment by the London Independent for the last two or three decades of his life, just this argument over the USS Vincennes and it all, you know, the subsequent investigations showed that Robert was absolutely right. It was a civilian airliner. It was not descending. And what had happened was Captain Will Rogers III was in the toilet when his men saw this aircraft on their radar screens, and they didn't know what to do. And they were sort of, I think they were yelling at him through the toilet door. There's a plane coming at us. What do we do? What do we do? Fire on it, you know? And they did, and they killed 263 people in cold blood. And what was really, really scandalous is that the crew of the USS Vincennes were decorated. They received medals of valor for having shot down a civilian airliner.

Chris Hedges 

Yeah, and I believe the captain was promoted.

Lara Marlowe 

He was. Years later, there was, I think it was his wife's car in San Diego, California had a bomb placed in it. I don't think she was hurt, but that also showed the sort of the long arm of Iran and its allies in the Middle East.

Chris Hedges 

So the reason I wanted to begin with that story is because it illustrates several points that come out in the book. First, how flagrantly those in authority everywhere lie. Israel lies like it breathes, but so does the United States. Second of all, it illustrates. he has a quote in the book. He's quoting somebody about how you need a little literary ability and rat-like cunning, which is so true.

Lara Marlowe 

Nicholas Tomalin, a British correspondent who was killed in the, I believe, the 1973 Arab-Israeli war, yes. And Robert always said, especially rat-like cunning.

Chris Hedges 

Well, especially rat like cunning is correct. When I covered the Ceausescu Revolution, same thing, you couldn't get a phone line for some weird reason in Ceausescu's Romania. Kent cigarettes were used as currency. So I went down to the hotel operators, gave them all cartons of Kent, and then again, they used Deutsche Mark, not dollars, and said that, I know how hard they worked, and they weren't being paid very well. I can see Robert doing exactly this and they had to call the international phone exchange to get an open line, which could take a very long time. And I said, look, every time you get an open line, call my room, and if I use it, I'll give you 10 Deutsche Mark. So every international call that came into the hotel, and all the bottom windows have been shot out by the Securitate, went to my room. I never had any problem filing my stories, but when I went down to the dining room, all the foreign correspondents were enraged because they were waiting hours for an open line. This is a classic example of rat-like cunning and why you need it. And of course, Robert exhibited this in spades. And then also, the other part of this story that's important is Robert's commitment to the truth. And let's be clear, I mean, you know as well as I do, probably the majority of our colleagues are just consummate careerists. Their commitment is not to the truth, they're very cynical. It's to their own advancement. And one of the reasons, I admired Robert for many reasons, but one of the reasons I admired him is his deep compassion, his deep empathy, but finally, his refusal to compromise, his refusal to allow any publication that he worked for to lie, which, of course, left him leaving the paper. You write in your own book, which is wonderful book, but you write, I think early on, when you're with Robert, that your competition was not another woman, but Beirut, the city of Beirut. And of course, I love it at the beginning, which shows you how naive you were. He promises that he'll stop war reporting and move to Paris. And I love that passage, because having done it, I knew Robert wasn't going to last in Paris at all, no matter how much he loved you, it didn't make any difference. And of course, next thing you're back in Beirut, trying not to get kidnapped. And you and I were in the same room in Syria when Terry Anderson was released, who was, what, held for seven years, the former AP bureau chief. But let's talk a little bit about Lebanon, especially, of course, the tragedy of what's happening. Robert was maybe the first, certainly one of the very first reporters, to get to Sabra and Shatila. This is where the Falangist Israeli-armed backed militias massacred, what's the exact number? 1,000? I don't know the exact number.

Lara Marlowe 

Never knew the exact number. It's certainly at least 1,000.

Chris Hedges 

At least 1,000 Palestinian civilians. And Robert got in there while the fighting was still going on. And that affected him deeply, and he, in a way, so much of his four decades, while the rest of the world was willing to forget the Palestinians, he wouldn't. Of course, another reason that, however unpopular it was, however much he was attacked, which he was, repeatedly, for being an antisemite, all of this kind of stuff. And I think that is another mark of a great journalist, in a way, because that is the story. The editors may not recognize, it's the story. The public may not recognize, it's the story. But you know, it's the story. Can you talk about that.

Lara Marlowe 

About Beirut or the Palestinians or Sabra and Shatila? I mean...

Chris Hedges 

About all of it, about Sabra and Shatila, how it affected him, and just Robert's determination to tell the story of the Palestinians, I mean, frankly, when not a lot of other people were telling that story.

Lara Marlowe 

Yeah, well, Sabra and Shatila, I think, marked him more than any other story. It's the only thing that I ever knew to give him nightmares, he would wake up, sometimes say, dreaming that he was buried under earth because the Falangist had bulldozed the bodies of the victims of Sabra and Shatila into these sort of big earthen banks. And Robert was actually climbing over one of these earthen banks, not realizing that they were bodies. When he looked down and saw a human face under his foot and he screamed and jumped off. But it was something that really haunted him, and he went back, he was in the habit of taking visitors to Beirut, including some of his editors to Sabra and Shatila. He didn't want it to be forgotten. In fact, I worked for Time Magazine then, and they, at one point, were going to bring the Time Magazine news tour, which was, they put the 80 richest men in America on a plane and flew them around the world, and they were going to stop in Beirut. And with Robert's help, I organized a visit to Sabra and Shatila, which never happened because the Clinton White House told them not to go to Beirut, but I had found eight or 10 families and and written up the history of each family, where they came from in Palestine and so on and so forth. And they would have, thanks to Robert, would have seen Sabra and Shatila many years later, but they would have seen what had happened there. And actually, the camps hadn't changed all that much. You still had these shanties and the open sewers and the poverty, the dirt roads. You could still see the Kuwaiti embassy, where the Israeli army was ensconced, and from which they watched the massacre being carried out. So yeah, Sabra and Shatila really I think changed Robert and reinforced his belief that the Palestinian question was the linchpin of the whole Middle East problem. And he believed very strongly that as long as there was not some kind of justice for the Palestinians, as long as they didn't have a state, there could never be peace in the Middle East. And I think we're seeing that proven very sadly, yet again now in 2024. He was absolutely right, and even when everyone else would forget about the Palestinians, Robert never did. When the Oslo Accords were signed in 1993, Robert said, immediately, this isn't going to work, and the Palestinians will get blamed for it. And that's exactly what happened. It didn't work, and the Palestinians got blamed for it. And he said the Israelis had, I think it was 250 lawyers or something, working on the agreement, and the Palestinians were, it was Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas, pretty much all alone, all by themselves. And Robert felt that they'd been hoodwinked. And I think that what happened subsequently showed that he was right about that as well. Yes, he felt very, very strongly about the truth and that one should tell it. Actually the Irish Nobel laureate who Robert and I both knew, Seamus Heaney, said once that there is such a thing is truth, and it can be told. And I always remember that quote, and I think it really sums up what Robert was all about.

Chris Hedges 

One of the things I just want to touch on before we go on, he schooled me on Oslo. I was a bit naive about Oslo, and I remember him laying out and him being, of course, as he almost always, was, completely correct as to why it wouldn't work. But one of the things, it comes through more in your book, actually, than in his, is the importance of literacy in terms of being a great writer. Both you and he... You quote a lot of poetry. You both loved poetry. He wrote poems to you. I used to write poetry, but I'm a good enough writer to know I'm a bad poet. But I read not just he had a voracious appetite for history, as you point out in your book, especially World War II and but you can't understand what's happening around you unless you understand the roots, unless you understand the context, unless you understand the history. And that's what makes his book such an amazing work, and I would argue, probably the most important work. I can't think of another book that's more important for understanding the modern Middle East, and he has, posthumously, has a new book. What's it called? I haven't read it yet.

Lara Marlowe 

It's called "Night of Power." Which is the night when Allah dictated the Quran to Muhammad.

Chris Hedges 

It's very special day for Muslims, yes.

Lara Marlowe 

Exactly. And the subtitle of it is: "The West's Betrayal of the Arabs," I think.

Chris Hedges 

Well, I think what's so important about his book is that by the time you finish, and it's long, but it's beautifully written, is that you just see betrayal after betrayal after betrayal. These betrayals are forgotten by us, but they're not forgotten by Palestinians or Iraqis or Iranians or everyone else, and that's what makes the book so important. The other thing that Robert understood is Israel. He understood the Israelis. He understood how they thought and why they did what they did. I'm just going to read this little passage, this is from Robert's book: "Netanyahu's most damaging flaw, his failure to regard the Palestinians as fellow humans. His conviction that they are no more than a subject people. This characteristic comes across equally clearly in his book, 'A Peace Among Nations,' which might have been written by a colonial governor. Clinton got it right. He understood the psychological defect that lay at the heart not just of Netanyahu's policy, but of the whole Netanyahu government. Yet, within just a few days," He's talking about Netanyahu, "he was presiding over yet another peace accord at Wye, which effectively placed the Palestinians in the role of supplicants. The main section in the Wye Agreement was not about withdrawals, but about security. And this was liberally laced with references to terrorists, terrorist cells and terrorist organizations involving, of course, only Palestinian violence. There was not a single reference to killers who had come from the Jewish settler community. Arafat's torture was exquisite. Each new accord with Israel involved a subtle rewriting of previous agreements. Madrid, with all its safeguards for the Palestinians, turned into Oslo, no safeguards at all, and a system of Israeli withdrawal that was so constructed that deadlines no longer had to be met. This turned into the 1997 Hebron Accord, which allowed Jewish colonists to stay in the town and made an Israeli withdrawal contingent upon an end to anti-Israeli violence. In 1998 the Wye Agreement even dropped the land for peace logo. It was now billed as the land for security agreement. Peace being at least temporarily unobtainable. Peace means respect, mutual trust, cooperation. Security means no violence, but it also means prison, hatred, and as we already knew, torture. In return, the Palestinians could have 40% of their territory under their control, as opposed to 90% they expected under Oslo and the CIA, the most trustworthy and moral of institutions would be in the West Bank to ensure that Arafat arrested the usual suspects." He totally captured this process by which Israel makes an agreement which was always open ended, always done in stages, and then rolls it backward, rolls it backward, rolls it backward, which, of course, we're now witnessing with the areas A, B and C in the West Bank, which have been violated. I think the Palestinians, I may have a figure wrong, are allowed to control on their own, about 19% of the West Bank. But now you have the settlers making incursions into Ramallah. And it wasn't just his deep understanding of history I love. He went after Tony Blair, remember, as what do you call him, after Kut, the British disaster in World War I, where they all got wiped out. What did he call him, Tony Blair, of...

Lara Marlowe 

Of Kut al-Amara, something...

Chris Hedges 

Of Kut al-Amara. Yeah, because the again, the British and the Americans go into Iraq, quote, unquote, as liberators, and they almost replicate word for word, Townsend's occupation of Iraq in World War I, and it was a disaster then. I mean he understands the cyclical patterns of history when you don't understand history and you don't learn from it. But he also understood the psychology of groups such as such as the Israelis.

Lara Marlowe 

Absolutely, I think it's in "The Great War for Civilization," he wrote that history is not only in the past, it projects itself into the future. And he saw history as a continuum. I think that's one reason that his work was so admired. Continues to be admired throughout the Middle East by Arabs and Iranians, because Robert knew their history. And you know, I'm very struck today as the world remembers the atrocities committed by Hamas on October 7, that there's a lot of commentary in the newspapers and on the radio, but all of the commentary that I have heard from Israelis and Israeli citizens, and some of them have suffered very greatly, obviously. But it's as if the whole conflict started on October 7, 2023. There is no mention ever of the context and the history of it. And I remember that when the Secretary General of the UN Antonio Guterres, said shortly after it happened that one must also consider the context and the history, the Israelis were outraged. They were absolutely outraged, and I think that's part of what bothered them about Robert, was that he knew that. And he would always remind people of what happened the last time, and of Baruch Goldstein, massacring Palestinians at worship in Hebron, of the Israelis driving out 750,000 Palestinians from their homes in the Nakba, in the catastrophe and so on. So you're right, he had an incredible grasp of history. He also predicted that the Oslo Accords would turn the Palestinians into the Israeli's policemen, and that's exactly what happened.

Chris Hedges 

That's exactly what the PA is and which is why Abbas and the PA is reviled.

Lara Marlowe 

Yeah, I'm afraid you're right.

Chris Hedges 

I covered the Hebron massacre. I had to go interview all the survivors for the New York Times. And to that point, I want to read another passage from his book, because he, for all the reasons you said, he grasped where things came from. And I used to think there were only two types of reporters. There were those reporters who didn't know what tomorrow's story was, and those that did. Robert always knew what tomorrow's story was. And when I was around other reporters who were too obtuse to not know what tomorrow's story was, I never worried, because I knew they'd be in the wrong place, covering the wrong thing, which is why, to be completely honest, whenever I found myself in the same city, which happened several times, including in Bosnia with Robert it scared the hell out of me. Because I knew he'd be in exactly the right place. He knew what tomorrow's story was. He writes, "When a society is dispossessed, when the injustice is thrust upon and appear insoluble, when the enemy is all powerful, when one's own people are bestialized as insects, cockroaches and two legged beasts, then the mind moves beyond reason. It becomes fascinated in two senses, with the idea of an afterlife and with the possibility that this belief will somehow provide a weapon of more than nuclear potential. When the United States was turning Beirut into a NATO base in 1983 and using its firepower against Muslim guerrillas in the mountains to the east, Iranian Revolutionary Guards in Baalbek were promising that God would rid Lebanon of the American presence. I wrote at the time, not entirely with my tongue in my cheek, that this was likely to be a titanic battle US technology versus God, who would win? Then, on the 23rd of October, 1983 a lone suicide bomber drove a truckload of explosives into the US Marine compound at Beirut airport and killed 241 American servicemen in six seconds. This, I am sure, was the suicide bomber to whom Nasrallah was referring, the one who drives into the military base smiling and happy. I later interviewed one of the few surviving American Marines to have seen the bomber. All I can remember he told me was that the guy was smiling. I spent months studying the suiciders of Lebanon. They were mostly single men, occasionally women, often the victims of Israeli torture or the relatives of family members who had been killed in battle with Israel. They might receive their orders while at prayer in the masjid, or mosque, in the south Lebanese villages. The Imam would be told to use a certain phrase in his sermon, a reference to roses or gardens or water or a kind of tree. The cleric would not understand the purpose of these words, but in his congregation, a young man would know that his day of martyrdom had arrived. In Gaza even before the Oslo agreement, I discovered an almost identical pattern. As in Lebanon, the would-be martyr would spend his last night reading the Quran. He would never say a formal goodbye to his parents, but he would embrace his mother and father, tell them not to cry if he were one day to die, then he would set off to collect his explosives." It's chilling, isn't it? Yeah, but that's it. That's it. I know, I interviewed these people too.

Lara Marlowe 

He understood. He really made the effort to understand why they did it. And I think he came closer than anybody else in the West, any non-Muslim to understanding. And he went and interviewed their families, their parents, their siblings. And one thing that often surprised me is that people well, for example, Hassan Nasrallah, who was just assassinated by Israel lost his eldest son, who was fighting the Israelis. He was killed by the Israelis, and he said he was honored, and he wished that all of his sons would be killed fighting the Israelis. And I think that no matter how many aircraft carriers and fighter jets and artillery shells and drones and no matter what the technology and the quantity of the weapons at your disposal, it's very hard to defeat an enemy who is willing to die. And I think that's one advantage that the Americans and the Israelis simply don't have. They want to live. Their soldiers want to live. And I don't think they've ever understood this, this willingness to die on on the part of Hezbollah and Hamas and their other enemies in the Middle East.

Chris Hedges 

That's how the Taliban drove the Americans out of Afghanistan, and to that point, he writes, "Today, the Arabs are no longer afraid. The regimes are as timid as ever, loyal and supposedly moderate allies, obeying Washington's orders, taking their massive subventions from the United States, holding their preposterous elections, shaking in fear, at least their people at least decide the regime change from within their societies, not the Western version, imposed by invasion, is overdue. It is the Arabs as a people brutalized and crushed for decades by corrupt dictators who are no longer running away. The Lebanese and Beirut under siege by Israel, learn to refuse to obey the invaders' orders. The Hezbollah proved that the mighty Israeli army could be humbled. The two Palestinian intifadas showed that Israel could no longer impose its will on an occupied land without paying a terrible price. The Iraqis first rose up against Saddam, and then after the Anglo-American invasion against the occupation armies, no longer did the Arabs run away. The old Sharon policy into which the American neoconservatives so fatally bought before the 2003 invasion of Iraq, of beating the Arabs till they came to heal, or until they behave, or until an Arab leader can be found to control his own people, is now as bankrupt as the Arab regimes that continue to work for the world's only superpower." And of course, we've seen that with the genocide in Gaza, whether it's Sisi's Egypt, King Abdullah's Jordan, Saudi Arabia, they have all been complicit in the genocide and I've spent several weeks in the Arab world since October 7, while the rage on the street is directed not only at the Israelis for mass slaughter, but at their regimes for its complicity.

Lara Marlowe 

Yes, but I think that this fighting spirit, this anger, which Robert referred to, it doesn't mean that the downtrodden and persecuted are always going to win. On the contrary, I think what we're witnessing now in Israel-Palestine, I fear, is the final ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people. I think especially if Donald Trump wins the election on November 5, that he will give Netanyahu carte blanche to do whatever he wants, and not just Netanyahu, Ben-Gvir and Smotrich. And they will drive the Palestinians of Gaza into Egypt. And they will drive the Palestinians of the West Bank into Jordan. And they will say the Palestinian problem has been solved. And I remember very much an interview Robert and I did with a philosopher called Leibowitz in Jerusalem.

Chris Hedges 

Yes, Yeshayahu Leibowitz.  No, and I do agree with you about certainly the intent of Israel, having just made two trips to Egypt, the Egyptian military has been quite categorical with Sisi that no Palestinians will be allowed to come into the Sinai. Whether that continues, I don't know.

Lara Marlowe 

Exactly, exactly. I think it was around the time of the First Intifada, if my memory is correct. And he said something I never forgot. He said, there is no necessity in history. It's not because we thirst for justice. It's not because the Palestinians have been dispossessed. It's not because Arabs have been betrayed through history, that this will be righted and I think he that Leibowitz was was right, and Robert knew that, but it didn't stop him chronicling what was happening and fighting for justice in his way, through his writing. How big is Egypt's debt, though? How many billion?

Chris Hedges 

160 billion. And the point is, Sisi is corrupt and certainly would be willing to be bought off. My understanding is the military high command has told him absolutely not. But things can change. We both know the intent of Israel, as you pointed out, is to ethnically cleanse the Palestinians. Of course, the Jordanian military has moved up to the border of the West Bank because they fear precisely what you said, ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. And I mean, Israel has already made it clear that they are going to, in essence, annex northern Gaza and then and create this already have created, but even let this humanitarian catastrophe fester in the south in the hopes that it does put enough pressure. But yes, I think that that is, and I think it was the end of your book, you talk about how Robert falls into a kind of despair, because after over four decades, things are worse. And I believe he even tells you, in your book, or you quote him in your book, he thinks it wasn't worth it. Was that a correct quote, or something like that?

Lara Marlowe 

No, he said that he feared that nothing he had written had made any difference, which isn't exactly the same as saying it's not worth it. I think that he's made a tremendous difference. I think that since October 7, 2023 and the killing of 42,000 Palestinians in Gaza, and now with a killing of thousands of Lebanese going on, I think that public opinion in the West is starting to shift, not among the leaders who are pretty gutless, but among the people, and especially young people, and that's why we've seen these mass demonstrations in many European countries. In the United States, we've seen the student occupations of university campuses, and it has become possible to criticize Israel in a way that was not possible before, even in mainstream media now, in newspapers like the New York Times, you have editorialists saying very strident things against Netanyahu and against the slaughter of Palestinians and Lebanese. So it's not changing as much as it should, or as fast as it should, or probably in the way that Robert would have liked it to change, but it is making a difference, and I think he did more than anyone else, to prepare the ground for that change. I was very struck. There's a young Irish novelist called Sally Rooney who's written several enormous bestsellers about young people in Ireland. And in one of her novels, one of the students at Trinity College Dublin is reading Robert Fisk, and it's true that young people do read him a lot, and he used to tell me that young people would come in droves to his lectures, and he got a lot of satisfaction out of that, despite his feelings of despair over the unchanging nature of the Middle East and the continued betrayal of the Arabs.

Chris Hedges 

There was a moment where he is attacked by a mob of Afghans and very severely beaten, I mean, and rescued finally by an Afghan and probably might have been killed if that stranger hadn't intervened, and I thought his response to that attack explained a lot about who he was. Can you tell us that story?

Lara Marlowe 

I know that he went back to the shop that was very near to the place where he was dragged off the bus and beaten with rocks. I saw him, our marriage was in difficulty then, but I went to Ireland to be with him a few weeks after that happened, and he still had, he probably seen the photographs of him with his forehead sort of split open and bleeding, and he still had the scab on his forehead. And he was very upset. And I think any of us would be to have an angry mob trying to stone us to death, which is what happened. And they were holding rocks in their hands and hitting him with a rocks. He was very upset. He also thought it was very fishy, because the only thing that they stole was his contacts book. He had a beautiful burgundy-colored leather like a filofax, which I had given him as a gift, which had all of his contacts. I mean all of the contacts, for example, which had led him to bin Laden. And it was all written in this tiny little scrawl of Robert's, which was very difficult to read, but that was gone. That was missing. Nothing else. They didn't take his passport or his money. Nothing else. He wondered, if there was some intelligence service behind it, if somebody sold that contacts book. He also told me that Daniel Pearl and his wife, I believe her name is, Marianne, took him in and took care of him when he got out of hospital after that horrible beating. And of course, Daniel Pearl was later beheaded in Pakistan, which was also extremely upsetting to Robert. He did, I know it was controversial, he said that he didn't blame the people who'd beaten him, because he said if the Americans had just bombed my village and destroyed my house and I saw, which is pretty much what had happened in Afghanistan, and I saw a Westerner on a bus on the Afghan-Pakistani border, I'd want to kill him too. And I think a lot of his colleagues thought that was a very stupid thing to say. Fisk forgives the people who nearly killed him, but that was his attitude, and that was Robert. He always wanted to understand. He wanted to know the other person's point of view. And he would often tell me, if I'd had rows with editors, that sort of thing, he'd say, put yourself in their place, or if I sent a ratty message on the Telex or by email, he'd say, "Now, how would it feel if you received that message Lara?" And he had an infinite capacity to do that. And I think that shows his humanity and the breadth of his spirit that he did that.

Chris Hedges 

Well, the ability to step into the shoes of others. I mean, he had that. That's what has made his reporting so tremendous. I'm going to disagree about foreign editors. I covered the war in El Salvador and with all these old guys who'd cover the war in Vietnam, and one of them said to me about foreign editors, never forget they're the enemy. I think was Dial Torgerson, actually.

Lara Marlowe 

Well, Robert had his rows too, with the London Times so, but he fought. He always fought the good fight, and he stood up for himself. By God, he stood up for himself. And I wouldn't have wanted to have been on the receiving end of a Fisk tirade, because you couldn't defeat him in an argument ever?

Chris Hedges 

Yeah, I had a few of those tirades, copy editors mangling your story. So there's a kind of funny subtext to his book. I want to ask you about. And that's his father, Bill Fisk. He dedicates... he had a very contentious relationship with his father. He dedicates the book. He dedicates "Pity the Nation," to you. He dedicates the book to his mother and father. His father had served in World War I and he talks in the book about how, when his father's dying, I think to his regret, he does not go say goodbye to his father. As a boy, his father takes him in summers off to World War I battlefields, but his father comes up repeatedly in the book, which I find fascinating, given the relationship that he had with his father. And I just wondered if you could talk about that.

Lara Marlowe 

Sure, sure, I knew his mother and father. His father died at the age of 93. He was from the northwest of England. I think he was from Liverpool or Manchester. My memory is failing me, but his father's father had been the first mate on the Cutty Sark, which Robert was very proud of. But Bill, his father, had been married a first time to a woman who apparently had just this incredible fear of sex, and I don't think they'd ever had sex, and she died, and Robert actually came upon her grave in the local cemetery in Maidstone Kent, and went home and asked his father about it. And his father said, What did you hear about that, boy? She was called Winifred Fisk. Anyway, and then his father married Robert's mother, who was more than 20 years younger than him, Peggy, who was a wonderful woman. She was very sunny disposition, very cheerful, always optimistic and I know that Robert got his his optimism from Peggy, but his father always said, he called him fella, which Robert thought was ironic since fella came from fellahin, Arabic for a peasant. He said, We've got to make a man out of you, fella. And he sent him off to British public school at the age of nine. So Robert went from having been this very spoiled only child whose mother used to bring him tea and toast in bed every morning to a British public school where they were woken up at five in the morning and had cold showers in the morning and were bullied and made to run and be cadets and military cadets and so on and so forth. And he hated it. He absolutely hated it. And the first time he was allowed to go home for a weekend, he cried and cried and cried and cried. And he said, Please don't send me back that. I hate it. I want to live at home with you. And his mother said, Please, Bill. And his father said, No, we've got to make a man out of you. And he hated his father. He really, really hated him. And it was only in the last years of his life that he relented. He admitted that his father had taught him to love books and taught him to love history, and he gave him credit for that, and he came to some kind of reconciliation. I think there was a very strong Oedipal thing in there, where Robert would probably hate me saying this, but he and his father were both in love with his mother, and I think they were competing for her love, and they were jealous of each other and Robert's hatred of authority, I believe, came from that relationship with his father. Oh, he never trusted American or British authorities, be they civil or military governments. He was always extremely cynical and skeptical, and that that all goes back to his relationship with Bill Fisk.

Chris Hedges 

Well, it goes back to, it goes back to boarding school. I went to boarding school at 10, very similar. And that's where I learned to totally hate all authority. Yeah. So those, if you have a strong will, their goal is to break you, and they break most people. They didn't break him, obviously. We have to mention the fact that, and he does in his book that his father is detailed to carry out an execution of a deserter and refuses and destroys his own career in the Army because of it.

Lara Marlowe 

Yes, and Robert did recognize that as a heroic act. And he said it was the one thing that he really loved about his father. And it was kind of a love, hate relationship. When his mother died, his father died before his mother about five years before, we went to clear out his parents' house, and Robert spent, I think we spent about three weeks there, because they had never, like all the Second World War generation, they had never thrown anything away. And Robert spent the whole three weeks in his father's library, going through the books and choosing the ones he wanted to keep. And he very much appreciated his father's love of books, and mostly history books. So I think you were talking earlier about Robert's literary bent, his skill as a writer, he could recite Shakespeare... when he went to interview Bin Laden that time in Afghanistan near Jalalabad, he was reading Tolstoy's "War and Peace." And I think in "Great War for Civilization," he talks about lying on the bed in this awful hotel with the air conditioning leaking on him, reading "War and Peace." So you have this funny back and forth between bin Laden and al Qaeda and the Napoleonic Wars and Napoleon's invasion of Russia. But that was Robert, this incredible juxtaposition, always, of literature and history and the news and present day.

Chris Hedges 

Which is very rare, but that literature is extremely important, not only if you're a writer, but also if you want to understand human nature, human psychology and how it works. And I know you quote Proust in your book, I'm a huge... I've read "In Search of Lost Time," three times, although not in French, unlike you. What?

Lara Marlowe 

I only read it once, not three times.

Chris Hedges 

The first time I read it was in the war in Bosnia. That's the other thing people don't know. You have a lot of dead time in war. You're sitting around trying to wait to get to places.

Lara Marlowe 

Robert always told a story about his friend, Ed Cody of The Washington Post.

Chris Hedges 

I knew Ed. Ed and I covered the war in Salvador together.

Lara Marlowe 

Yeah, Ed's a great guy. He speaks very good Arabic, I dare say, better than Robert, but he would always, when he encountered an obstreperous militia man who didn't want to let him through a checkpoint, he would just pull a volume of Verlaine out of his pocket and sit down by the road and start reading poetry. And he always had a little volume of something with him for those occasions, and Robert enjoyed telling that story about Ed. He knew patience, which Robert wasn't always quite so patient, but he would, he knew how to charm people into letting him through, or not shooting him, or whatever.

Chris Hedges 

Well, he was one of, you know, probably the greatest reporter in the Middle East of our generation. That was Lara Marlowe on her book, "Love in a Time of War." And then we, of course, have been discussing Robert Fisk's masterpiece, "The Great War for Civilization." I think Lara, you probably agree that if you want to understand the modern Middle East, I don't think there's probably a better book.

Lara Marlowe 

Absolutely.

Chris Hedges 

I want to thank Diego [Ramos], Thomas [Hedges] Max [Jones] and Sofia [Menemenlis], who produced the show. You can find me at ChrisHedges.Substack.com.

58

As Russia Seizes Major U.S. 🎩 Bank Assets, Washington Punishes Iran's Oil Exports


Sean Foo 164K subscribers Oct 14, 2024
Follow me on X(Twitter) here:   / seanfoogold   thank you!

The economic war is getting more and more brutal. We have Russia seizing assets from a US Banking giant, JP Morgan. Washington just hammered Iran's oil exports amid an impending strike on their energy infrastructure. Here's how dangerous the geopolitical situation is.

✅ Timestamps & Chapters:
0:00 Putin Seizes US Banking Assets
2:33 Russia Grabs UK's Unilever
5:49 US Hammers Iranian Oil Exports
7:31 Sponsor: Indigo Precious Metals
8:56 Washington Oil Sanctions
10:16 Economic Hit To China
13:09 EU The Big Loser Again

Subscribe to my channel where we dive deeper into the world of gold, silver & investing:
🔴 Subscribe: https://bit.ly/3kzabfN

Disclaimer:
The information presented on this channel is for news, education, and entertainment purposes only. The information does not constitute an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any investment product(s) or investment strategies, or a substitute for professional investment advice. It does not take into account your specific investment objectives, financial situation or needs. I am not a financial advisor or a licensed investment professional. Please consult with your financial advisor before following any investment strategies discussed herein.

AGelbert COMMENT:
🦉 Chinese Proverbs appropriate to the current world situation:

Who cannot sail a ship when the sea is calm?

Dying embers can still start a fire. – Western Han Dynasty

Gold is tested by fire, and man is tested by gold.

True gold fears not the test of fire.

Do not worry if others do not understand you. Worry if you do not understand them. – Confucius, Spring and Autumn Period

Even the hardiest plant will not flourish if left in the cold for ten days out of every eleven. – Mencius, Warring States Period

Pay out a long line to catch a big fish. – Traditional Chinese Proverb

He who strikes first admits that his ideas have given out.

The swing of a sword cannot cut the mist from the sky. – Li He, Tang Dynasty

Fish big enough to swallow a boat are not found in ditches. – Yang Zhu refuses to be a big fish in a little pond, Zhou Dynasty

A tiger does not take insults from sheep.

Large chickens don’t eat small rice.

The art of war lies in thwarting the enemy’s plans, in breaking up his alliances, and then, only then, in attacking his army. – Sun Zi, Spring and Autumn Period

Patience is a tree with bitter roots that bears sweet fruits.

He is victorious who knows when and when not to fight.
– Sun Zi, Spring and Autumn Period
59
👉 Emojies by AGelbert. 👈

🕯️🗽 Philip Giraldi • October 10, 2024 • 2,100 Words • 217 Comments • ReplyQ&A

Who Is In Charge of US Foreign Policy?

Is it Israel and its Powerful Lobby or The White House or No One at all?

SNIPPET:

It probably would surprise no one to learn that there are several viewpoints among critics of the current wars devastating the Middle East regarding who is actually encouraging a growing bloody conflict which might soon involve at least six countries in the region. In simple terms, there is a school of thought that believes that Israel, backed by its various powerful diaspora lobbies, is defying world opinion to continue its slaughter of its indigenous Palestinians and neighboring Lebanese. In other words, it is all about Israel acting maliciously and badly. However, another viewpoint sees instead a neocon dominated United States foreign policy exploiting Israeli truculence and its hard right wing leadership to carry out American national objectives in the region, in a sense using Israel as its proxy and actually encouraging its bad behavior. Meanwhile, a third plausible examination of developments tends to meld the two approaches, suggesting that the US and Israel are in a conspiratorial cooperative relationship and are in full agreement regarding reducing the power of the Jewish state’s neighbors. That would make Israel the preeminent military power dominating the Persia Gulf and beyond to control a large chunk of the world’s energy resources while also benefiting American weapons manufacturers and other political and Wall Street constituencies.

The problem is that there is sufficient carefully selected evidence to support every point of view including an alternative suggestion that American foreign policy is broken, adrift and does not reflect any US national interest at all, witness the recent $8.7 billion aid package sent to a belligerent Israel when Americans were dying in North Carolina in the wake of a devastating hurricane for which FEMA only provided meager assistance because it claimed it had run out of money. The steady flow of money and weapons from the US to Israel suggests that the United States is for some reason supporting Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s expansion of the war against Hamas when the White House could have ended the war in a day by cutting off that support. Alternatively, Israel might be seen as continuing its slaughter in spite of perhaps insincere US objections because it presumes that its powerful Lobby in the US will keep Joe Biden in line with an election coming up lest it weigh in heavily to help Donald Trump. And, of course, if the two nations are acting in collusion it could all be Kabuki with Washington and Tel Aviv cynically intending to do whatever it takes reshape the Middle East to Israel’s benefit. Take your choice of which scenario fits best.

One needs to determine what actually justifies the reality of a multiplicity of fronts, to include providing political cover in the UN, where the United States is interacting to support “greatest ally and best friend” Israel while at the same time constantly verbalizing the apparently false claim that it is trying to avoid the conflict’s expanding into a major conflagration that could engulf the entire region and beyond, driving up energy costs dramatically just for starters. Such a managed co-escalation might also increase the risks and costs geometrically as more players get involved, up to and including the possibility that Israel will opt to use its nuclear weapons to “defend” itself or to attack Iran, which is where both Russia and the United States might become involved in a nuclear exchange to defend their respective “friends.”

So what is the truth and what are the lies and who in Washington and/or Tel Aviv is calling the shots in the Middle East? And what do they really intend and how do they see it all ending? There are four obvious US government 👿 🐍 players  who are on the ground and meeting with the key figures in the nations involved in the fighting as well as with those ostensibly engaged in the what are being called negotiations to put an end to the killing with a ceasefire acceptable to all parties. One must concede that their task is a difficult one at best as all parties to the peace talks recognize that the United States is not an unbiased intermediary given its total commitment to support Israel politically as well as with arms and money while freely labeling the Jewish state’s neighbors and opponents alike as “terrorists” and “autocrats.” The four would be composed of two obvious officials Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Director William Burns and Secretary of State Antony Blinken while a third and fourth are not-so-well-known, consisting of special negotiator for the president Amos Hochstein and the White House Coordinator for the Middle East Brett McGurk. Both Burns and Blinken have made numerous trips to the Middle East and Ukraine to convey the views of the president and make their own assessments of the situation on the ground after meeting with local officials. The role is rather unusual for Burns as a CIA Director normally operates behind the scenes and does not get involved in policy making, but Burns is not a typical director in that he has no background in intelligence. He was a highly regarded State Department officer who wound up as the US Ambassador to Russia. He very carefully worked through the nuances of the US-Russian relationship and was highly praised for explaining things from the Kremlin perspective so US planners would be able to understand very clearly the differing perspectives of the two nations. He described, for example, how very sensitive Russia was over the issue of Ukraine becoming part of NATO, a warning which was subsequently ignored by President Biden.

Blinken is, of course, better known as he served as Deputy Secretary of State during the Barack Obama administration and is regarded as a particularly close associate of Joe Biden. As Secretary of State he has been a very active traveler throughout both the Middle East and Ukraine. Blinken is Jewish and is regarded as a protector of Israel, which is, of course, also the President’s frequently enunciated view. After the Israeli assassination of Hezbollah leader Nasrallah he said that the “World is safer without Nasrallah…” whereas most of the world would quite reasonably prefer to see Benjamin Netanyahu removed. Blinken also appears to favor preemptively attacking Iran to eliminate its nuclear energy program even though there is no evidence that it is weapons-development related. He has recently come under pressure for lying about two State Department reports that indicated very clearly that Israel has been deliberately starving and killing the Gazans by blocking US supplied food and medicine supplies at the border. One large convoy of trucks containing enough food to feed most of the local people who were in danger of dying from starvation was deliberately held up at the border until the food became rotten and had to be destroyed. Blinken lied both to Congress and to the American people about the Israeli policy, saying that blocking food supplies by Israel was not taking place. It was a consequential lie as people died and are continuing to die because of it and Blinken has paid no price for what must surely be considered a major war crime.

The third policy planner is an unusual individual Amos Hochstein, who was born in Israel and served in the Israeli Army. He has been designated as Biden’s personal roving ambassador in the Middle East with a particular brief to work to avoid the expansion of the Gaza fighting into Lebanon against Hezbollah. In that effort, he has obviously failed as both Israel and Lebanon now consider themselves to be at war. It is presumed that Hochstein is the “active arm” in the White House campaign to shield Israel from any harm initiated by its much abused neighbors. Why anyone would select an Israeli who is a product of the Israeli Army as a negotiator of some type among the nations that the Israelis have been victimizing for the past seventy-five years has to be considered an enduring mystery. It is perhaps another gimmick move by Biden to pretend that he is neutral in the conflict while doing everything he can to turn Netanyahu free to destroy or subject all his neighbors.

Which brings us to the fourth likely top planner National Security Council Coordinator for Africa and the Middle East Brett McGurk. McGurk has been a bipartisan fixture floating around the national security and diplomatic communities for a number of years with the reputation of being a “hardliner” particularly when dealing with Arabs, which is not to say that he has learned anything beyond the fact that if one wants to survive in Washington it pays to love Israel. It is interesting to note that the Biden Administration claims that it is working hard to achieve a ceasefire in both Lebanon and Gaza but it continues to cover for Israel politically and provide it with the weapons and money to continue it genocidal activities as well as in support of its plan to occupy southern Lebanon to create a “buffer zone.” Israeli media is already reporting that real estate agents are offering attractive properties for Jewish buyers in what is still Lebanon, just as Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner has been peddling exclusive sea front lots in Gaza. In other words, don’t believe anything coming out of the Biden Administration as evidence for anything as it appears that its “policy makers” and press spokesmen have acquired the Israeli tendency to lie about everything.

Full article:
https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/who-is-in-charge-of-us-foreign-policy/
60
Richardstevenhack The Five Essentials

Quote from Michael Hudson ✨ on Nima Alkhorshid’s   channel:
Quote
“So what we’re seeing is a good cop-bad cop pretending. The United States doesn’t want to be blamed by the whole-world abhorrence for what is happening in Israel. So it pretends to say, “That’s not us; we want to be the good guys; we told him to be gentle when he dropped his bombs and not kill anybody.” But he’s killing people. And we keep giving him bombs and telling him to be gentle with it. Well, what can we do? We don’t have control – he’s a “sovereign country” as you played at the beginning. So all of this is just a charade.”

Got that right. And the US doesn’t want to be blamed for the upcoming war with Iran, either. But it wants the war, make no mistake.

As Hudson also says:
Quote
Netanyahu is doing just what the United States wants. The dream of Netanyahu is the same dream of the US neo-cons: war with Iran. Because if you can conquer Iran, then you just close up everything between Israel and Iran. You take up Syria, Iraq; you move down into Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. You take over the whole Near East.”

🕯️ Alon Mizrahi > Richardstevenhack

I don't know if you've noticed it in the nonstop stream of major events, but this last week or so has been not only one of the worst in Netanyahu's demonic career, but also the worst Israel had in the eternity of the genocide. I would also contend this has been one of the worst weeks for Zionism in many decades.

It all began with Hezbollah's drone attacks, which cost the lives of 4 IDF soldiers and injured dozens more (practically an entire company has been wracked; very few 18-year-olds will be able to continue functioning after seeing their friends dismembered in front of their eyes). It reached a new peak today with the US practically announcing that Israel is committing such a criminal campaign of ethnic cleansing, starvation, and extermination in Gaza, that the US may be forced to stop arming it.

Yes, Israel has been given a month which it will use to extort and manipulate in DC and murder in Gaza and Lebanon, but in terms of the narrative war, the US government basically admitted that the pro-humanity, pro-Palestine protest movement was right, and Israel is an international criminal against humanity.

This is freaking huge, even if the US doesn't follow through, or not completely. It is huge. It is a historic admission and landmark.

And this administration, bound to Zionism as it is, made this letter public: they want the world to know what they think about Israel at this moment.

Finally, in between the drone attacks, against which Israel is practically helpless, the US is placing a THAAD system in Israel, announcing further that Israel is incapable of defending itself even with billions in aid.

Israel's air defenses are no match for Iran's missile and drone capabilities while committing internationally-recognized war crimes.

It was also the week hundreds of reservists declared they would refuse to go into service if no hostage deal was made.

-

Israel's military and diplomatic standing suffered huge blows, and its indefensibility has gotten strikingly more pronounced.

I also watched Netanyahu's video from the military base where Hezbollah's drone hit, and he looks clearly panicked, and out of balance. He cannot even mimic his usual fake nonchalance anymore.

-

This week marks a turning point in this war and genocide. And it means what it always means, and what I always predict: Israel is about to escalate significantly against Lebanon and Iran. It is going to suffer some major damages, perhaps even of the debilitating sort.

This will not result in empathy for Israel, on the contrary. The more fragile Israel looks militarily, the less fearful people and organizations will feel to act and speak against it.

Zionism only inspires fear, no love. When the fear abates, a very loaded truth is going to emerge.

-

Israel just ordered more evacuations in southern Lebanon, and Hezbollah said that if the war continued, they were going to spare no one and nothing in Israel.

I think things are about to experience a drastic and violent twist. This whole thing is entering its moments of truth.

AGelbert > Alon Mizrahi
Well said. Thank you for your irrefutably accurate observations and wise analysis. Let me add my thoughts on the moral bankruptcy integral to the Zionist Ideology. 

When people seriously study why the Zionist Ideology is so socially destructive, while, in depraved Orwellian fashion, Zionists sanctimoniously claim Zionism is “socially constructive”, the rotten ideological ROOT of Zionism is exposed:

It’s the SOCIAL DARWINISM.

Social Darwinists believe that ethics based principles are 'limitations pretending to be virtues'. To them, ethics are 'feel good illusions' that humans invented to pretend our species has empathy. To Social Darwinists, empathy is irrefutable evidence of inexcusable weakness. To them, all who are guided by ethics are deluded fools that should be eliminated from the human 'apex predator' gene pool for the "good" of our species.

Social Darwinists believe that the dictum, “survival of the fittest” (a term coined not by Charles Darwin but by sociologist Herbert Spencer), means that only the "fittest" should survive. Darwin's book published later ("Descent of Man") made it clear that Darwin completely supported the morally bankrupt views of Spencer.

The ideology of the Social Darwinist is indistinguishable from the despicable ideology of NAZI Germany, clearly exemplified in their brutally enforced morally bankrupt concentration camp law: “Eat your own bread, and if you can, that of your neighbor.”

Social Darwinism is the morally bankrupt world view that spawned the profit over people and planet neoliberal ideology. Neoliberal intellectuals like Friedrich von Hayek, Ludwig von Mises and Milton Friedman were all Social Darwinists long before they renamed laissez-faire liberalism (that had been thoroughly discredited by the Great Depression) with the catchy title of "Neoliberalism".The celebrated social theorist and geographer David Harvey explains that neoliberal ideology serves the following principle:
Quote
"There shall be no serious challenge to the absolute power of money to rule absolutely. And that power is to be exercised with one objective: Those possessed of money shall not only be privileged to accumulate wealth endlessly at will, but they shall have the right to inherit the earth, taking either direct or indirect dominion, not only of the land and all the resources and productive capacities that reside therein, but also assume absolute command, directly or indirectly, over the labor and creative capacities of all those others it needs. The rest of humanity shall be deemed disposable."
Read more:
Thread SOURCE:
https://substack.com/@alonmizrahi/note/c-72776120

Learn more: 🕯️
https://alonmizrahi.substack.com/p/what-israel-is-really-after
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10