News:

Blessed are they who hunger and thirst for justice: for they shall be filled. The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple. Bless thou the Lord, O my soul. Let the words of my mouth, and the meditation of my heart, be acceptable in thy sight, O Lord, my strength, and my redeemer.

Author Topic: Darwin  (Read 10330 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ken Ham CLASHES With Bill Nye in Public Debate!
« Reply #90 on: »

Ken Ham 🕊️ CLASHES With 🙊🙉🙈 Bill Nye in Public Debate!


Answers in Genesis 639K subscribers 28,539 views  Sep 29, 2023

Did God create the heavens and earth in six days, or did the universe evolve over the course of billions of years? In this video, Bill Nye debates Ken Ham on the origins of the universe and life, as well as the viability of creationism in our current scientific era.

See the full debate: 👀
 • Bill Nye Debates Ken Ham - HD (Official) 

========

Answers in Genesis is an apologetics (Christianity-defending) ministry dedicated to enabling Christians to defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ effectively.

On our YouTube channel, you’ll find answers to your most pressing questions about key issues like creation, evolution, science, the age of the earth, and social issues. We desire to train believers to develop a worldview based on the Bible and expose the bankruptcy of evolutionary ideas and their implications.

You’ll hear from top teachers such as Ken Ham, Bryan Osborne, Dr. Georgia Purdom, Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, Tim Chaffey, Bodie Hodge, Dr. Gabriela Haynes, Dr. Terry Mortenson, and more.

Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world:
Help us share the truth of God’s Word and the gospel through your generous donations, prayers, and volunteer work.
Answers in Genesis · AnswersinGenesis.org
« Last Edit: October 01, 2023, 08:07:58 pm by AGelbert »
So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets. Matthew 7:12

Science Doesn’t Say Anything— Scientists 👨‍🔬 Do
« Reply #91 on: »
Science Doesn’t Say Anything—Scientists Do (2023 Dallas Conference on Science and Faith)


Discovery Science 208K subscribers  Oct 3, 2023

Author Frank Turek dissects the biases and assumptions of some who claim to speak for science in our culture. President of CrossExamined.org, Dr. Turek is co-author of books such as "I Don’t Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist" and "Legislating Morality." He has debated prominent atheists including Christopher Hitchens and Michael Shermer, founding publisher of Skeptic Magazine. Turek has appeared on hundreds of radio programs and many top TV networks including Fox News, ABC, and CBS. A former aviator in the US Navy, Frank has a master’s degree from George Washington University and a doctorate from Southern Evangelical Seminary. This talk was delivered at the 2023 Dallas Conference on Science and Faith sponsored by Discovery Institute.

============================
The Discovery Science News Channel is the official Youtube channel of Discovery Institute's Center for Science & Culture. The CSC is the institutional hub for scientists, educators, and inquiring minds who think that nature supplies compelling evidence of intelligent design. The CSC supports research, sponsors educational programs, defends free speech, and produce articles, books, and multimedia content. For more information visit
We are the institutional hub for scientists, educators, and inquiring minds who think that nature supplies compelling evidence of intelligent design. We support research, sponsor educational progra...
Center for Science and Culture · discovery.org

Original reporting and analysis about the debate over intelligent design and evolution, including breaking news about scientific research.
Science and Culture Today · evolutionnews.org

Introductory to academic articles, videos, books, and news on intelligent design, the theory that features of the universe are best explained by an intelligence.
Intelligent Design · intelligentdesign.org


Follow us on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter:
Twitter:
profile
X (formerly Twitter) · twitter.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/discoverycsc/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/discoverycsc/

Visit other Youtube channels connected to the Center for Science & Culture
Discovery Institute:   https://www.youtube.com/user/DiscoveryInstitute
Dr. Stephen C. Meyer:    https://www.youtube.com/user/DrStephenMeyer
« Last Edit: October 08, 2023, 10:57:43 pm by AGelbert »
So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets. Matthew 7:12

A Popular Just-So Story on the Origin of Bird Flight Bites the Dust
« Reply #92 on: »

October 6, 2023, 6:43 AM by Günter Bechly

Confuciusornis male

Fossil Friday: A Popular Just-So Story on the Origin of Bird Flight Bites the Dust

This Fossil Friday features the early bird Confuciusornis from the Lower Cretaceous of Liaoning in China. Last week I reported for Fossil Friday on a just-so story about ichthyosaur evolution and how it fell apart (Bechly 2023). This week I want use the opportunity to report yet another case of a popular evolutionist just-so story that recently was put to rest for good. It is about the origin of avian flight.

An Old Debate About Birds

There is a long-running debate in evolutionary biology, asking whether birds took off by running and flapping from the ground up (cursorial hypothesis), or whether they jumped as gliders from the tree down (arboreal hypothesis). About twenty years ago there was a modification of the cursorial hypothesis suggested by Dial (2003), based on the observation in chicks of living Chukar partridge: it is the so-called wing-assisted incline running (WAIR) hypothesis, which suggested that wing flapping lifts the body during uphill running. This was also claimed to answer the old question “What use is half a wing?” (Dial et al. 2006), which obviously is not just an iconic question Darwin skeptics came up with.

The WAIR hypothesis quickly became more and more popular, with dozens of studies published on various aspects, such as aerodynamics (Tobalske & Dial 2007, Dial et al. 2008), mechanics (Bundle & Dial 2003), kinematics (Baier et al. 2013), and computer modelling (Heers et al. 2018). “According to the proponents of the WAIR hypothesis, adaptation to WAIR in avian ancestors prepared their locomotor apparatus for the subsequent evolution of forward flapping flight. In other words, WAIR is proposed as a preadaptation to full-fledged avian flapping flight.” (Kuznetsov & Panyutina 2022)

The Function of Wing Flapping

However, last year a new study by Kuznetsov & Panyutina (2022) showed that, contrary to earlier beliefs, the function of the wing flapping during uphill running is not to lift the body, but to push it towards a steep slope. This is the opposite adaptation to powered flight and requires very different muscles. Actually, “it follows that the action of the forelimb during WAIR cannot preadapt the musculature in a non-flying ancestor to free flapping flight. Furthermore, the wing action during WAIR [already] requires highly developed avian flight musculature.”

Therefore, the authors concluded that “Wing-assisted incline running should be regarded as a crown locomotor specialization of birds and is not an appropriate model for locomotion in avian ancestors.” Unsurprisingly, there was not a shred of paleontological evidence for the WAIR hypothesis (Nudds & Dyke 2009), and non-avian feathered dinosaurs as well as early birds arguably were incapable of WAIR (Senter 2006), which is the opposite of the model’s prediction. It looks like yet another evolutionist just-so story bites the dust after empirical data failed to support the imaginative storytelling.

References

GÜNTER BECHLY SENIOR FELLOW, CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND CULTURE
Quote
Günter Bechly is a German paleo-entomologist who specializes in the fossil history and systematics of insects (esp. dragonflies), the most diverse group of animals. He served as curator for amber and fossil insects in the department of paleontology at the State Museum of Natural History (SMNS) in Stuttgart, Germany. He is also a Senior Fellow with Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture. Dr. Bechly earned his Ph.D. in geosciences from Eberhard-Karls-University in Tübingen, Germany.
This is not how good science is supposed to work but is rather typical for pseudoscience that shields itself against empirical falsification.
Science and Culture Today · evolutionnews.org
« Last Edit: October 11, 2023, 08:05:04 pm by AGelbert »
So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets. Matthew 7:12


Quote
An atheist was seated next to a dusty old 🤠 cowboy on an airplane and he turned to him and said, “Do you want to talk? Flights go quicker if you strike up a conversation with your fellow passenger.”

The old cowboy, who had just started to read his book, replied to the total stranger, “What would you want to talk about?”

“Oh, I don’t know,” said the atheist. “How about why there is no God, or no Heaven or Hell, or no life after death?” as he smiled smugly.

“Okay,” he said. “Those could be interesting topics but let me ask you a question first. A horse, a cow, and a deer all eat the same stuff – grass. Yet a deer excretes little pellets, while a cow turns out a flat patty, but a horse produces clumps. Why do you suppose that is?”

The atheist, visibly surprised by the old cowboy's intelligence, thinks about it and says, “Hmmm, I have no idea.”

To which the cowboy replies, “Do you really feel qualified to discuss God, Heaven, and Hell, or life after death when you don’t know crap?”










Quotes from that rare breed, Honest Atheists:


« Last Edit: December 01, 2023, 04:13:28 pm by AGelbert »
So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets. Matthew 7:12

In Obedience to Ezekiel Chapter 33 Verse 8 📢🚨 WARNING of Darwinian Social Decay and Destruction
As a God fearing Christian, I am required by God to warn my fellow humans of any Socially and Spiritually Destructive Ideological Deception, that if not rejected, will destroy human society and doom the soul of all who embraced it.

When I say unto the wicked, O wicked man, thou shalt surely die; if thou dost not speak to warn the wicked from his way, that wicked man shall die in his iniquity; but his blood will I require at thine hand. -- Ezekiel 33:8

Though the following comment I made recently at The Class Struggle, a web site where (mostly) social justice advocating socialist atheists post, was studiously ignored (i.e. no up votes or replies), I 🙏🏼 pray that the seed I planted, along with the warning, will someday germinate through God's Grace and lead many to Life Everlasting. If not, God will not require their blood from my hand. I warned them. It is now in God's hands.
Quote
The Class Struggle

Friday, December 1, 2023



AGelbert COMMENT: My take on this erudite piece is welcoming the fact that, though rather briefly, it correctly sheds light (SEE: any port in the storm) on the root cause of the present social decay and destruction:

"Explicit and outspoken prejudices of this kind are no longer acceptable in many circles, yet social Darwinism lurks everywhere and remains the ugly cornerstone of most mainstream political thought. And it continues to underwrite the racisms and neocolonialism of our present era."

I hasten to add that Social Darwinism continues to underwrite a lot more than racisms and neocoloniaism. The Hydrocarbon Fuels Based Corporations are in-our-faces examples of Social Darwinist "Apex Predators" in action. Their "circles" are QUITE ACCEPTING (i.e. 'You ain't gonna work here if ya ain't FULLY into dis.') of the Social Darwinist modus operandi:



December 2, 2023


Despite the above blatant example of how PERVASIVE Social Darwinist Ideology is at present, I have become convinced that, because this morally bankrupt ideology is so entrenched in the default conscious and subconscious worldview of most humans, any attempt to point at Social Darwinism as the ROOT cause of social decay and destruction touches the REJECT BUTTON NERVE on most, otherwise rational, people of good will. 🥺

No, I am not kidding. All of us, whether highly educated or not, are not now, or ever, completely free from the prejudices implanted in us by our 🙊🙉🙈 edumacation system. No matter how much we pride ourselves in critical thinking skills, we all have those sacred cows that we defend to the hilt. To many here, my "Sacred Cow" is Monotheism in general, and Christianity in particular. Most here might think, but are (mostly) too polite to say openly, "Matthew 7:12 is all well and good, but only when you leave your god sacred cow out of it, can we can support it.".

Well, what is good for the goose is good for the gander. Too many people, including most religious AND non-religious Americans, cannot bring themselves to accept that the cancer of Social Darwinism is what is eating our civilization alive, always opting to single out some other, of several 'pick your poison ones' out there, socially destructive isms. I contend that the reason all those isms, which I firmly believe are actually downstream byproducts of Social Darwinism, are consistently and studiously opted for instead of fingering Social Darwinist Ideology, is because there is a little voice in their head that says 'might really does equal right'.

That voice, unlike the altruistic impulse we have, though many have managed to pretend their dog ate it, is part of our dog eat dog baser instincts, and was there thousands of years before Darwin wrote his Evolution Theory Book.

However, Darwin's Theory of Evolution, taught as unquestionable scientific truth, from the time people are knee high to grasshoppers until, and after, graduate school, implanted a megaphone app on that voice in every person's head. Most reading this would argue till the cows come home that said Theory is certainly NOT, as I "quixotically claim" pseudo-scientific speculation.

No, I'm not going to bore you with DNA information, precise energy constants and so on. How life got started is not the issue I wish discuss.

What I am doing here is pointing out that the ENTRENCHED belief that human BEHAVIOR is the result of Evolution Theory based random undirected processes is what inhibts seeing Social Darwinism as the scourge that MUST be ELIMINATED from acceptance, at ANY LEVEL of human society, if we are to survive.


As long as people can point to this, that, or the other Ism as "the problem", Social Darwinism WILL CONTINUE to motivate "JUSTIFICATION" for the "My Way of the Highway" socially destructive modus operandi/vivendi.    

I will give you an example of an ISM that has Social Darwinism at its ROOT: It is Zionism, though most people, due to that voice in their head, do not want to go there.

Capitalism and Liberalism are two other, not so obvious, examples.

Hitler's National Socialism was unapologetically Social Darwinist to the core.

 

The U.S. Duopoly and for profit corporations in the USA (and most, if not all, of the world) are run by and for Social Darwinists. What is "Perception Management" mendacious corporate propaganda if not Social Darwinism based legerdemain?   

Even Game Theory, when stripped of the "competitive advantages and disadvantages" jargon, is Social Darwinism based Kafkaesque survival olympics in thought, word and deed.

But back to Zionism, I am posting the following comment thread from War Is Not Abstracted by Caitlin Johnstone in the hope, forlorn as it is, that I can get past that Darwinian Homo Sapiens "reality" voice in your head:


S.L. Writes S.L.’s Substack
See... this was the whole problem with Gaza. They didn't take enough time to manufacture consent!

Bibi thought that by using the 9/11 playbook, people would globally and immediately side with Israel against Gaza. The problem was that the attack simply wasn't flashy enough. On 9/11, we allowed a major religious building to be hit (the US official religion is commerce, after all - and what better representation that the two tallest buildings of commerce in the US?) - it was photographically spectacular.

The attack on the settlements was not photographed until it was too late. No big rockets bombing a landmark; no people falling from buildings; no images of weeping fire-fighters covered in ash... really, as far as manufacturing consent goes, the mission was an utter failure.

When will they learn? You either need to keep things hidden (Yemen, Africa), pump out a few years of propaganda and false flag ops* (Syria, Iran, Afghanistan). It's not enough to just arm the 'terrorists' and then use 'terrorism' as an excuse anymore. You need to run a years long campaign from all sides declaring that your opponents are 'commies' and of being 'Hitler' (Russia, China) - that's how you manufacture sufficient consent!

You can't just allow a few small townships to be attacked and then expect full-bodied global blood-thirst! Bibi and his pals just didn't think this through.

AGelbert > S.L.
Yes, the Social Darwinists 'R' US playbook has its morally bankrupt, but far too effective, perception management "rules".

Another reason 9/11 was so "effective" at its impact on the propagandized masses is that PNAC, way back in 1998, decided that the fascist takeover agenda for the USA needed another "Pearl Harbor" in order to be successful. They KNEW 9/11 was going to happen, at least 6 months before it happened, because of YEARS of careful planning for the sequence of destructive events, including that "airliner" that magically shrunk to the size of a missle when it hit the Pentagon, the military drone versions of airliners to crash into the two tallest WTC towers (NOTE: they KNEW that the military drone versions of airliners would be unable to bring the WTC towers down - the airliners were for propaganda optics), AND obtaining the services of Netanyahu's tight lipped Zionist Team of explosive demolition experts to rig WTC 1, 2 AND 7 for explosive demolition. By a strange coincidence, Netanyahu was in NYC on 9/11, the same day the dancing Israelis were filmed joyously filming the burning WTC towers....


Perhaps Gore would have delayed their MIC Fascist Dream Come True for a few years, but I doubt that because the MIC has owned the Duopoly for at least half a century, if not more. At any rate, as soon as Bush and Cheney took office. The BIG GREEN LIGHT for the "New Pearl Harbor" to take place was given.


See below, irrefutable evidence that 9/11 was an inside job:



It's the Social Darwinism, stupid!

Les Writes Les’s GeoPolitical Essays - Age… > AGelbert
On Social Darwinism and its origins ->
   
AGelbert > Les
Good, but rather long article.

🤠 So, let me summarize:
📢 Social Darwinist Ideology is the pseudo-scientific exercise in the erudite, but mendacious, defense of the morally bankrupt modus operandi/vivendi commonly known as, 'Might Equals Right'.

Of course this socially destructive worldview is as old as humanity, but it was Darwin's "PRESERVATION OF FAVOURED RACES IN THE STRUGGLE FOR LIFE" legerdemain that convinced ethics challenged Academia into accepting it as, not only the privilege, but the "Evolution Theory based Obligation" of we-the-apex-predators to do our BEST to 😈 "rid the world of the lesser" races.

Netanyahu, a member in good standing of the Social Darwinists 'R' US, knows his MORALLY BANKRUPT "Darwinian Duty"....



« Last Edit: January 07, 2024, 06:31:41 pm by AGelbert »
So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets. Matthew 7:12

Atheists are Comfortably Doomed to Perdition DEEP Inside Plato's Cave
« Reply #95 on: »

AGelbert NOTE (All graphics and emojies for info, emphasis, doubting honesty, exposing pearl clutching sacharine dishonesty and fallacious attack the messenger legerdemain by atheists are by me.):
The following unreasonable replies and comments directed at me from some Atheists are a testament to what we Christians are subjected to when attempting to 🕯️ reason with Atheists in regard to the merits of 🕊️ Christ's Gospel and the plethora of scientific evidence that a Providencial, Loving, Just God Created our Universe and LIFE within it and that our spirits continue to exist after physical death for eternity. I will never achieve the level of dedication and steadfastness that 🕊️ Paul the Apostle did, but this quote form Paul in the Word of God provides comfort for me. I can relate:
 
Therefore seeing we have this ministry, as we have received mercy, we faint not; But have renounced the hidden things of dishonesty, not walking in craftiness, nor handling the word of God deceitfully; but by manifestation of the truth commending ourselves to every man's conscience in the sight of God. But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them. For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord; and ourselves your servants for Jesus' sake. 2 Corinthians 4:1-5.
ADDED NOTE: For those who may think that Caitlin Johnstone is not a committed Atheist that firmly believes there is NO LIFE AFTER DEATH, despite here poetry about a Dead Poet smiling down from the great beyond via the white waving tail of a kite, here are a few quotes from her lamenting WHY Humans can be so destructive and evil and HOW we will eventually "evolve" out of that. I have placed in bold some parts so that no person, at least no person who still uses reason to think and come to OBVIOUS conclusions, can seriously entertain ANY doubt that Caitlin Johnstone is a True Believer in her Atheist Hero Charles Darwin's "Theory":
Quote
How did we get here? How were we duped into trading paradise on earth for this lunatic dystopia? How did we allow ourselves to give up everything our species has the capability to be in exchange for this nightmarish paradigm of endless ecocide and exploitation and oppression and war and militarism?

Near as I can tell, it’s ultimately because our species evolved these massive brains very quickly which we still haven’t learned how to use in a mature way, like a kid learning to ride a bicycle right after the training wheels have been removed. This has allowed us to dominate the planet while still ourselves being dominated by primitive fear-based impulses which were much better suited for our early evolutionary ancestors as they strived to survive the dangerous plains of Africa as small prey animals. ... ...

The most clever of these manipulators are able to use their cleverness to rise to the top of our political, governmental, commercial and financial systems around the world, and they use increasingly sophisticated methods of propaganda to dupe the rest of us into moving in alignment with their will. And their will is not wise or intelligent; it’s driven by the same primitive fear-based impulses that the rest of the humans trapped in egoic consciousness are driven by.

So here we are. That’s why we now find ourselves in this profoundly dysfunctional civilization where the biosphere is treated like an enemy and human beings are treated like fuel and minds are being marinated in an increasingly vapid mainstream culture where everything is fake and stupid. That’s why we don’t have paradise on earth, and that’s why the bombs are falling on Gaza today.

But it is just a phase. A kid who’s learning to ride a bike doesn’t remain on wobbly wheels forever. Eventually we’ll get the hang of this thing. Eventually we’ll grow into these giant new brains of ours and become a conscious species.

Assuming we don’t wipe ourselves out first, of course.
January 5, 2024

newestbeginning > AGelbert
Dear agelbert, I think it is a mistake to characterize all atheists/theists as monolith and maybe also to imagine we understand each other.

Given we don't know how much time we have, we should use what we have as well as we can. Living a kind, generous and loving life to the extent we can, will do us no harm - even if we have a few million more years after that. We can know what people do. We cannot know what other people think or believe except to the extent they tell us and we pay attention to what they say.

Also, a fundamental principle in living life is understandingand accepting that there is more we don't know than we can ever know. Socrates wisely said, the wisest is the one who knows that he knows nothing. We simply cannot know what we do not know and there is more about physical manifestations than we know. We cannot adequately describe what life is, nor consciousness. Materialists realize that what we know is a tiny sliver of all there is to know. What happens after death is unknowable, so why not live the best life we can while we know that we can do it? There is no downside to that
Quote
IF, on the other hand, 80 years or so is all you get before you get the dubious privilege of being recycled by goddess gaia, your FOCUS is going to be EXCLUSIVELY on YOUR PHYSICAL WELFARE for those 80 years or so.
I do not know where you get this notion. It does not fit with what I see or try to do. Many people spend their lives serving the interests of others.  You know, when I volunteered in various roles attempting to relieve suffering of the vulnerable, it had nothing to do with my physical welfare. It was simply my way of fulfilling my human obligation to other people. With the religious, these sorts of things are considered transactional. For the non-religious, they are simply about contributing what one can to the wellbeing of others.
Quote
As the Social Darwinism promoting Game Theorists make CLEAR, guile can play a role in your logical goal to get whatever you can by pretending to be altruistic until you can destroy the human competition you pretended to befriend (ALL friendships are pretenses according to Game Theory - EVERYONE who is honest about our 3D Universe REALITY is EGOCENTRIC) for goods and resources at an opportune time.
I guess Social Darwinists would do so but not every atheist is a Social Darwinist. It is a mistake to make that assumption.
Quote
YET, you atheists eat that "HUMAN SOCIAL PROGRESS" LEGERDEMAIN like cotton candy at a fair.
Huh?
Quote
WHY do you atheists INSIST on equating HERESY with HONEST BIBLE BASED THEISM? The HERETICS calling themselves "Christians" who support GENOCIDE against Palestinians by Israeli Zionist HELLSPAWN HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH "MIGHT EQUALS RIGHT" SOCIAL DARWINISM AND NOTHING TO DO WITH RELIGION!!! It's the use of GAME THEORY GUILE at it's MOST stomach churning EVIL!
I don't know why people confuse heresy with honest theism other than the fact we can't read people's minds. It is sometimes hard to tell the difference as both claim "purity". Besides, atheists are subject to the same habits of overgeneralizing errors that Theists are, and they make the sort of errors that 🐒 you are making here. 

Also, many of us have had so many terrible experiences while attempting to participate in, and join religion, that we seek to avoid more abuse.
Quote
I celebrate efforts by you and other atheists anywhere who are ethics based, but I am weary of "religion" being used as a whipping boy. I have HAD IT with people of good will ignoring the FACT that most greedballs out there, since time immemorial, have USED some "deity" as an excuse to compete in making the hit parade of in-our-faces continuous breaking of the Ten Commandments for hellspawn fun and profit.

Greedballs DO NOT believe in ANY "god" BUT THEMSEVES, no matter WHAT THEY SAY! Atheists cannot seem to get that through their UNspiritual heads. ALL atheists SEE, no matter how much they claim to be, "spiritual", is the 3D universe. In a universe with no metaphysical nature, there are NO SPIRITS. There is NOTHING BEYOND PHYSICAL LIFE, PERIOD. There is NO LIFE AFTER PHYSICAL DEATH. There is NON-EXISTENCE after death, PERIOD.
Thank you for kind words.

Why is "religion" a whipping boy? Because "religion" that is decried is a business like any other , that tries to pretend it is something else.
Quote
Greedballs DO NOT believe in ANY "god" BUT THEMSEVES, no matter WHAT THEY SAY! Atheists cannot seem to get that through their UNspiritual heads.
Of course. The problem is religious belief is unfalsifiable. All one needs to claim the religious mantle is to make the claim that one believes.
Quote
if the 3D universe is all there is, as you atheists firmly believe.
See this is a problem because I have never said I firmly believe the 3D universe is all there is, and have not implied it to my knowledge, so why would you make this hostile assumption? It is a serious impediment to discussion. If Johnstone incorporated the kite metaphor, perhaps  SHE doesn't believe what 🐵 you think she believes.
Quote
BUT NONE of you believe that metaphysics is anything but a fanciful la-la land made up by we Theists. No matter how you wish to present your view as compassionate, you have ZERO respect for the Theistic worldview.
I have tried to get my head around metaphysics and it is mostly a realm I do not understand. Reading others, it seems to be a realm most people don't understand either and those who do, have strong beliefs that "🐵 they" know the truth, but everyone else doesn't. I don't have any such certainty and do not understand how others can "get there". There are more questions for me, than there are answers.
Quote
Atheists are victims. Does that make you laugh? Does that make you scoff? Does that make you pity the ignorance of a fellow like me that makes the claim that you atheists are victims of a box canyon logic based Procrustean Bed? IF you laugh, scoff, pity or FEEL any other emotion besides curiousity, as to what my basis for making that "irrational" (to an atheist) claim is, then you are the irrational party here.
I don't know what you are talking about here nor what you mean by victims. The victimhood that I see is the lack of connection between fellow human beings; the separation from other people - and bitter loneliness that results from the barriers we erect.
Quote
The point I have obviously failed to get accross to you atheists, most of you who have a thorough knowledge of human history, is that MONOTHEISTS HAVE PREVENTED FAR MORE EVIL than those PSEUDO-MONOTHEISTS carrying the label have caused. YOU DO NOT WANT TO GO THERE. YOU DO NOT WANT TO TALK ABOUT PERCENTAGES. YOU REFUSE TO SEE that the "MIGHT EQUALS RIGHT" HELLSPAWN are FAR MORE PREVALENT in SOCIALLY DESTRUCTIVE ACTIONS BY TPTB than RELIGION.

On the day that someone here, hopefully you, FINALLY decides to be OBJECTIVE about the PERCENTAGES of the different ideological and religious influences (i.e. WHO were the MOST THAT DID WHAT to corrupt human civilization over the past 2000 years), I will be happy to post here again.
I can't tell the difference between a fake Christian or a real one ; as you say here, many who make the claim do so as cover for antisocial and violent behavior.

This is obviously a subject near and dear to your heart.
If you would like to post about it, please do. We can make a new post about it if you want.

AGelbert > newestbeginning
I am overwrought right now. This GENOCIDE in Palestine has got me down, down, down. The following is an abbreviated reply. I'll reply fully some other day. Today I am monitoring the situation in Palestine and the outrageous plan by Biden to attack the Sans Allah (i.e. Houthis) INSTEAD of just telling the Zionist Crazies to stop murdering people in Gaza: 

You are entitled to your opinion, but atheists are the ones doing most of "monolithing" demonization of against Christians. Here's a (far too common) example from atheist Dan Smith today:
Quote
Dan Smith January 5, 2024
There is no dog almighty you totally delusional fool. Why would this dog almighty let "chrisitians", the largest genoicidists EVER create all sorts of nutty RW christian sects that have always been as bad and worse than all the epsteins of the world.

Why would a dog almighty aid and abet the American Holocaust, all the scum founding liars, founding genocidists, founding rapists and slavers?

You and idiots like you support the most evil people ever.
Dmar3 is certainly more polite than Dan Smith, but her message is delivered in the exactly same  (pardon the non-materialist pun) spirit. I've never seen you ask Dmar3 to be more measured in tone, so you cannot claim that you do not support her habitual irrational broad brush condemnation of Religion in general and Christians in particular.

Plato's Cave is far more applicable to my claim that you atheists limit yourselves to a materialist Procrustean Bed than anything Socrates, wise as he certainly was, wrote.

My advice to you, which I'm pretty sure is already habitual for you (except on the issue of religion),  is to pay attention to what people DO, and not what they SAY. The fact that you do not have any tool here to do that except written words leaves you in a quandary. The more obvious liars like fuster are easy to spot, but I could be some sanctimonious arse hole just playing head games with you. Vocabulary skills and a smattering of critical thinking ability does NOT guarantee good will or an ethical worldview, so the quandary remains.

I just look at the consistency of the posts from posters. I watch closely for inconsistencies in logic or ethics. That's the best I can do. But hey, I'm a nobody who gets 4 views in my forum when I have a good day, so my opinion is not exactly popular. And you know what, I do not blame them. I physically avoid humans like the plague. So, for all my vaunted "Christianity", I am less than useless as a force for good in this world. That is the truth as I see it. You can be nice and say that I'm just having a bad day, and I'm really one of the good guys, but when I cannot do ANYTHING to stop that GENOCIDE by MY GOVERNMENT, enthusiastically backed by Hagee Heretic Hellspawn "Christians", I want to SCREAM!!!!!!!! You HAVE NO IDEA HOW IT FEELS to be a Christian and see people carrying that label doing the EXACT OPPOSITE of what Christ taught. Rant over.

Happy 🕊️ Three Kings Day tomorow, newestbeginning.

Dmar3 > Agelbert
I don't see very many atheist forced birthers, and the one I did argue against decades was basically alt-right (ie, a racist fascist so with a lot of problems in his thinking already) before alt-right was even terminology. Otherwise they've been Christians.

Agelbert > Dmar3


Dear Dmar3, your argument is equivalent to condemning the Health Care Profession because some malevolent, but very intelligent, resourceful and ambitious Doctors and Nurses are psychos that position themselves in nursing homes and/or intensive care units of Hospitals in order to murder patients. There is a proportionality distinction deficit in your argument that you do not want to acknowledge, despite irrefutable historically documented evidence of socially constructive good will by the overwhelmig majority of Theists, be they Christians or not.

I don't blame you modern day Atheists of good will for the 100's of thousands, if not mllions, of humans murdered because of the actions/orders/influence of atheists (in thought, word and deed) Geghis Kahn, Mao, Pol Pot, Lenin, Hitler, Stalin and Henry Kissinger, to name some of the more egregious examples of true believers in "Might Equals Right". Why do you blame ALL Christians for some corrupt bastards among us?

God Bless you, Dmar3. I do not  do divide and conquer fascist wedge issues; I'll stick with Matthew 7:12 ("Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets."), NOT because it is the ethical thing to do (though it certainly is if you aren't a masochist or a sadist), but because Jesus Christ COMMANDED me to do it as a condition to my obtaining everlasting LIFE. I cannot do this on my own; I require the indwelling of God's Holy Spirit to aid me in this endeavor that is otherwise impossible for my human fallen spirit flesh. I will do that, God willing, until my last breath in this Valley of Tears.     


Dmar3 > AGelbert
"There is a proportionality distinction deficit in your argument that you do not want to acknowledge, despite irrefutable historically documented evidence of socially constructive good will by the overwhelmig majority of Theists, be they Christians or not."

But if that was true neither Jim Crow or slavery could've lasted as long as they did in the US. Just like right now one of the single biggest correlations with Trump support besides racist is fundamentalist Christian.

Wake up

AGelbert > Dmar3
Dmar3 doing what she does:

Racist Atheist Darwin, not the Christian Religion, had EVERYTHING to do with THIS:


THAT was the very same EVIL that "justified" continued RACIST Jim Crow (i.e. "new-and-improved" SLAVERY after the Civil War).

BEFORE the Civil War, it was Christian Quakers who ran the 🕊️ Underground 🗽 Railroad, but that doesn't fit your version of history, so you, of course, never mention it in your anti-religion/anti-Christian rants (GOOGLE IT, instead of making stuff up, if you doubt what I said!). 

AFTER the Civil War The KKK used the basements of Southern Baptist churches to meet before they went out to burn somebody's house (mostly Blacks, but sometimes a white Christian who didn't buy into their murderous racist UNbiblical CRAP) or hang an African American at a church picnic attended by all those "Christians".  Their HERETICAL interpretation of the racial descendents of Noah sanctimoniously made the claim that "Blacks were a servant race for Whitey". A lot of the "Evangelical Christians" are still into that Doctrine of Demons CRAP. They probably think Palestinians are part of the "servant races" too. Their Stupid, Racist, Demonic Anti-Christian, socially destructive worldview was, and mostly still is, supported by your hero DARWIN and his followers, in thought, word, and deed.

Christ's teachings are the EXACT OPPOSiTE of that. We are ALL ONE BLOOD according to the Christian RELIGION, no matter how many whitey racist snake oil salesmen in some pulpit claim otherwise. Your gross inability to discern between hypocrites and the real item is absolutely breathtaking, but I should be used to it by now. You are notably silent about the totally evidence free speculation that Evolutionists trot out as "science".


The ET in the flying saucer in the graphic below thinks just like you:


 

 Dmar3, you are going full backfire effect.


Therefore, I see no further merit in using logical arguments based on historical evidence and critical thinking to address  your spurious allegations and topic dodging non sequiturs.

You are so deep inside Plato's Cave that only a miracle will get you to see reason. Have a nice day.


 


AGelbert > Becker (Democratic Party Propagandist who had my detailed post exposing his hypocrisy of correctly condemning Trump's Crimes while ignoring Biden's War Crimes deleted as "spam".) 
So, you have the mods "spam" my detailed reply out of existence, even though I didn't post any links? So much for "Freedom of Speech" and "Objective Discourse".

Do you "spam" Scripture too?

Surely every man walketh in a vain shew: surely they are disquieted in vain: he heapeth up riches, and knoweth not who shall gather them. -- Psalm 39:6

Blessed is that man that maketh the Lord his trust, and respecteth not the proud, nor such as turn aside to lies. Psalm 40:4

Let them be ashamed and confounded together that seek after my soul to destroy it; let them be driven backward and put to shame that wish me evil. -- Psalm 40:14


👿 Dan Smith > AGelbert
AG: Do you "spam" Scripture too?
=====
the lying scriptures spam the lying scriptures.

AGelbert > 👿 Dan Smith
Spoken like a loyal Social Darwinist. You will reap what your Socially Destructive, Wall Street worshipping Game Theory GUILE has sown, if not in this life, then certainly in that next one you will be forced to believe in a few seconds after your last breath.

May God have mercy on you and all the other deluded, self worshipping fools out there before it is too late for you and everyone you bear the responsibility for fomenting greed in throughout your morally bankrupt life.

👿 Dan Smith > AGelbert
There is no dog almighty you totally delusional fool. Why would this dog almighty let "chrisitians", the largest genoicidists EVER create all sorts of nutty RW christian sects that have always been as bad and worse than all the epsteins of the world.

Why would a dog almighty aid and abet the American Holocaust, all the scum founding liars, founding genocidists, founding rapists and slavers?

You and idiots like you support the most evil people ever.

AGelbert > 👿 Dan Smith
Your argument is equivalent to condemning the Health Care Profession because some malevolent, but very intelligent, resourceful and ambitious Doctors and Nurses are psychos that position themselves in nursing homes and/or intensive care units of Hospitals in order to murder patients. There is a proportionality distinction deficit in your argument that you do not want to acknowledge, despite irrefutable historically documented evidence of socially constructive good will by the overwhelmig majority of Theists, be they Christians or not.

I don't blame any modern day Atheists of good will (i.e. Atheists who haven't abandoned ethics in favor of Social Darwinism YET) for the 100's of thousands, if not mllions, of humans murdered because of the actions/orders/influence of atheists (in thought, word and deed) Genghis Kahn, Mao, Pol Pot, Lenin, Hitler, Stalin and Henry Kissinger, to name some of the more egregious examples of true believers in "Might Equals Right". Why do you blame ALL Christians for some corrupt bastards among us?

👿 Dan Smith > AGelbert
A: for the 100's of thousands, if not mllions, of humans murdered ....
=====
Like the 100 million murdered in the American Holocaust, by white "christians", some 33 times the G Holocaust. Then there is the Aussie Holocaust, the Kiwi Holocaust, myriad usa Holocausts all over the planet.

AGelbert > 👿 Dan Smith
You are right that many who carried the "Christian" label promoted and participated in the American Holocoust. The Bible says we are ALL ONE BLOOD. The perversion of the Gospel of Christ to fit European racist land grabs is what happened in America (North AND South) AND Africa AND Australia. If you want to blame Christianity for that, then you are a true student of Orwell. 


I am glad you brought up the aussie and Kiwi Holocausts. You Evolution Theory true believers OWN THAT.


It was ONLY the Christian influences that rejected Darwin's "lesser races" racist legerdemain.




👿 Dan Smith > AGelbert
Note well how there NEVER is any evidence for any dog almighty. The notion is totally illogical on its face.

 AGelbert > 👿 Dan Smith
Wrong again.
Intelligent Design is scientifically irrefutable.


Information Enigma: Where does information come from?

« Last Edit: January 07, 2024, 10:53:19 pm by AGelbert »
So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets. Matthew 7:12

Uncovering the Truth About 🦕 🦖 Dinosaurs 1: Digging into Dinosaurs
« Reply #96 on: »


Uncovering the Truth About 🦕 🦖 Dinosaurs 1: Digging into Dinosaurs



Institute for Creation Research (ICR) 36.4K subscribers Jan 26, 2024

The full series is available to members of the Champion of Creation tier!

Interviews with experts reveal intriguing information about favorite dinosaurs like T. rex and Triceratops, while host Markus Lloyd explores a fossil dig where paleontologists work to unravel the mysteries hidden in dinosaur bones.

Uncovering the Truth about Dinosaurs explores the most fascinating and mysterious creatures of all time—dinosaurs. We know they existed because we've discovered their footprints and fossilized bones. But the facts of their existence—and their extinction—remain shrouded in mystery. What were the dinosaurs? When and where did they live? How and when did they die? And why does it matter to Christians? The answers to these mysteries are buried in Earth's layers and revealed in the pages of the Bible. Studying evidence from paleontology, geology, biology, archaeology, and history, we'll get to the bottom of the story and unearth the real truth about dinosaurs.

Join this channel to get access to perks:
 
 / @icrscience 

Or join us on Patreon:
 
 / instituteforcreationresearch 





« Last Edit: January 28, 2024, 09:38:21 pm by AGelbert »
So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets. Matthew 7:12

John Lennox: Science DOESN'T Explain What You Think It Does
« Reply #97 on: »
🕊 John Lennox: Science DOESN'T Explain What You Think It Does (Brilliant Insights!)



Practical Wisdom 12.8K subscribers Subscribed 5.5K 322,758 views  Premiered Dec 15, 2023  #richarddawkins #johnlennox #apologetics

Oxford mathematician and apologist John Lennox is joined by Samuel Marusca and Justin Brierley at the Practical Wisdom Conference in London to discuss faith in the age of science. John Lennox challenges conventional beliefs about science's explanatory scope, and exposes that science doesn't even explain what you think it does.

Lennox delves into the assertions of Richard Dawkins and Stephen Hawking, who propose that the Universe originated from nothing, presenting a compelling case for creationism. He adeptly critiques the limitations of the theory of evolution while simultaneously clarifying his position on the age of the Earth, claiming he is NOT a young earth creationist and emphasizing its compatibility with the Christian worldview. Moreover, meaning and the semantics of language suggest that there is intelligent design in the universe.

Justin Brierley, author and broadcaster, moderates a captivating Q&A session where Lennox shares profound insights on the problem of evil and articulates why Christianity stands apart from other religions. This enlightening discussion at the intersection of faith and science promises to broaden perspectives and elevate your understanding of our complex world.

🤝 SUPPORT US:
Help sustain the Practical Wisdom Podcast - your support fuels thoughtful content, events, and community impact.
PracticalWisdom - · practicalwisdom.org.uk
...
Your generosity helps us continue this work and contribute to vital conversations.

📍 SUBSCRIBE: https://www.youtube.com/@Practical.Wi...

SUMMARY
0:00: 📚 John Lennox discusses the relationship between science and faith, addressing Dawkins' 🙊🙉🙈 claim that science disproves God.

8:38: 🤔 The misconception that God and science are alternatives in terms of explanation, and the difference between the two.

16:11: 🤔 Lennox addresses the problem of meaning in our world, and the semantics of language which suggests there is a mind behind it.

24:30: 🤔 Lennox challenges Stephen Hawking's statement that the universe can create itself from nothing, and questions the definition of 'nothing' by scientists.

32:33: 🔬 Scientists are now questioning Neo-Darwinism and discuss the role of divine input in biological evolution.

41:06: 📚 The discussion covers topics such as the importance of evidence, Wittgenstein's philosophy, and the agenda of transhumanism.

48:54: 📜 Are miracles a violation of the natural law?

57:17: ⚠️ The changing questions of meaning and identity, and the potential consequences of bioengineering on human identity.

1:05:30: 🌌 Are there other forms of intelligence in the universe?

1:20:53: 🤔 Why is there suffering in the world and how do we face it, particularly in the context of the existence of a good and all-powerful God?

1:29:34: 🙏 Is Christianity a unique religion and are other religions false?

Huge thanks to  @medialux company for their exceptional video production work which brought this discussion to life!
Click here to find out more about their outstanding work:
Medialux Productions is a video and film production company producing outstanding films through strong storytelling.
Medialux · medialuxproductions.co.uk


#johnlennox  #faithandscience  #richarddawkins  #intelligentdesign #christianity  #apologetics  #practicalwisdom  #interview #education
HCMGGEW4C0S6GCAH
So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets. Matthew 7:12


Racial Science in Nazi Germany


Library of Congress 303K subscribers 30,004 views  Jan 14, 2020
Richard F. Wetzell discusses his research at the Library on the history of racial science in Nazi Germany. The Library of Congress has more than 8 million German-language items. 

-  Richard F. Wetzell is a research fellow at the German Historical Institute in Washington, D.C. His most recent publication is the co-edited volume, "Beyond the Racial State: Rethinking Nazi Germany," along with his other publications, "Inventing the Criminal: A History of German Criminology, 1880-1945," "Engineering Society: The Role of the Human and Social Sciences in Modern Societies, 1880-1980" and "Crime and Criminal Justice in Modern Germany."

For transcript and more information, visit
Richard F. Wetzell discusses his research at the Library on the history of racial science in Nazi Germany. The Library of Congress has more than 8 million German-language items.
The Library of Congress · loc.gov


Agelbert COMMENT: Social Darwinism is STILL pervasive among morally bankrupt humans among us, from too many scientists to ALL the Oligarchs destroying human society NOW.


The New York Times

April 6, 2024 By Alexander Nazaryan

Prestigious Medical Journal Ignored Nazi Atrocities, Historians Find

The New England Journal of Medicine published an article condemning its own record during World War II.

Nazi doctors and scientists on trial at Nuremberg in 1947 for human experiments, murders and other atrocities during the Holocaust.Credit...Fox Photos Ltd./Sydney Morning Herald, via Alamy

A new article in the New England Journal of Medicine, one of the oldest and most esteemed publications for medical research, criticizes the journal for paying only “superficial and idiosyncratic attention” to the atrocities perpetrated in the name of medical science by the Nazis.

The journal was “an outlier in its sporadic coverage of the rise of Nazi Germany,” wrote the article’s authors, Allan Brandt and Joelle Abi-Rached, both medical historians at Harvard. Often, the journal simply ignored the Nazis’ medical depredations, such as the horrific experiments conducted on twins at Auschwitz, which were based largely on Adolf Hitler’s spurious “racial science.”

In contrast, two other leading science journals — Science and the Journal of the American Medical Association — covered the Nazis’ discriminatory policies throughout Hitler’s tenure, the historians noted. The New England journal did not publish an article “explicitly damning” the Nazis’ medical atrocities until 1949, four years after World War II ended.

The new article, published in this week’s issue of the journal, is part of a series started last year to address racism and other forms of prejudice in the medical establishment. Another recent article described the journal’s enthusiastic coverage of eugenics throughout the 1930s and ’40s.

  “Learning from our past mistakes can help us going forward,” said the journal’s editor, Dr. Eric Rubin, an infectious disease expert at Harvard. “What can we do to ensure that we don’t fall into the same sorts of objectionable ideas in the future?”

In the publication’s archives, Dr. Abi-Rached discovered a paper endorsing Nazi medical practices: “Recent changes in German health insurance under the Hitler government,” a 1935 treatise written by Michael Davis, an influential figure in health care, and Gertrud Kroeger, a nurse from Germany. The article praised the Nazis’ emphasis on public health, which was infused with dubious ideas about Germans’ innate superiority.

“There is no reference to the slew of persecutory and antisemitic laws that had been passed,” Dr. Abi-Rached and Dr. Brandt wrote. In one passage, Dr. Davis and Ms. Kroeger described how doctors were made to work in Nazi labor camps. Duty there, the authors blithely wrote, was an “opportunity to mingle with all sorts of people in everyday life.”

“Apparently, they considered the discrimination against Jews irrelevant to what they saw as reasonable and progressive change,” Dr. Abi-Rached and Dr. Brandt wrote.

A Nazi nurse with German children undergoing procedures to attempt to lighten their hair and eyes for a more Aryan appearance in the early 1940s. Credit...Universal History Archive/Universal Images Group, via Getty Images

For the most part, however, the two historians were surprised at how little the journal had to say about the Nazis, who murdered some 70,000 disabled people before turning to the slaughter of Europe’s Jews, as well as other groups.

“When we opened the file drawer, there was almost nothing there,” Dr. Brandt said. Instead of discovering articles either condemning or justifying the Nazis’ perversions of medicine, there was instead something more puzzling: an evident indifference that lasted until well after the end of World War II.

The journal acknowledged Hitler in 1933, the year he began implementing his antisemitic policies. Seven months after the advent of the Third Reich, the journal published “The Abuse of the Jewish Physicians,” an article that today would most likely face criticism for lacking moral clarity. It appeared to be largely based on reporting by The New York Times.

“Without providing any details, the notice reported that there was some indication of ‘a bitter and relentless opposition to the Jewish people,’” the new article said.

Other journals saw the threat of Nazism more clearly. Science expressed alarm about the “crass repression” of Jews, which took place not only in medicine but also in law, the arts and other professions.

“The journal, and America, had tunnel vision,” said John Michalczyk, co-director of Jewish Studies at Boston College. American corporations avidly did business with Hitler’s regime. The Nazi dictator, in turn, looked favorably at the slaughter and displacement of Native Americans, and sought to adopt the eugenics efforts that had taken place across the United States throughout the early 20th century.

“Our hands are not clean,” Dr. Michalczyk said.

Dr. Abi-Rached said she and Dr. Brandt wanted to avoid being “anachronistic” and viewing the journal’s silence on Nazism through a contemporary lens. But once she saw that other medical publications had taken a different tack, the journal’s silence took on a fraught new meaning. What was said was dwarfed by what was never spoken.

“We were looking for strategies to understand how racism works,” Dr. Brandt said. It seemed to work, in part, through apathy. Later, many institutions would claim that they would have acted to save more of the Holocaust’s victims had they known the extent of the Nazis’ atrocities.

That excuse rings hollow to experts who point out that there were enough eyewitness reports to merit action.

“Sometimes, silence contributes to these kinds of radical, immoral, catastrophic shifts,” Dr. Brandt said. “That’s implicit in our paper.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/06/science/nazi-science-new-england-journal-medicine.html?unlocked_article_code=1.i00.R5GG.aOhDbS63vQtD&smid=url-share

« Last Edit: April 08, 2024, 11:33:49 pm by AGelbert »
So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets. Matthew 7:12

C.S. Lewis ☝🏻 and 😒 Evolution
« Reply #99 on: »
C.S. Lewis ☝🏻 and 😒 🦍 Evolution


CS Lewis ✨18K subscribers 300,173 views  Feb 12, 2013

"C.S. Lewis and Evolution" is the second of three short documentaries inspired by the book The Magician's Twin: C.S. Lewis on Science, Scientism, and Society. It examines the evolution of Lewis's views on orthodox Darwinian theory from his time as a college undergraduate to his death in 1963.

More Articles
C.S. Lewis Web · cslewisweb.com



« Last Edit: April 11, 2024, 01:10:15 am by AGelbert »
So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets. Matthew 7:12

Beyond Narnia: The Real Life Of 🕯️ C.S. Lewis ✨
« Reply #100 on: »
Beyond Narnia: The Real Life Of 🕯️ C.S. Lewis ✨


Real History 177K subscribers 28,809 views  May 13, 2023

CS Lewis's biographer AN Wilson goes in search of the man behind Narnia - bestselling children's author and famous Christian writer, but an under-appreciated Oxford academic and an aspiring poet who never achieved the same success in writing verse as he did prose.

From the ancient civilizations of years past to the dawn of the Space Race, every week we'll be bringing you award-winning documentaries featuring some of the world's best historians. Subscribe so you don't miss out.

Real History is part of the History Hit Network.
Any queries, please contact owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com



So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets. Matthew 7:12